Captain Caveman
is one Smokin' Farker
- Joined
- May 4, 2007
- Location
- Carthage, Mo.
It looks real good to me.
Thanks.:-D
It looks real good to me.
That would fit most BBQ'ers needs.Although it has ran 16 hrs without refuling @ 225 :biggrin: .
On those gravity-feed systems, how do you keep the whole chute of coals from going up like one big chimney?
That makes too much sense. Thanx. :smile:The top of the chute (where you load the charcoal) has a door on it that seals air tight. the chute fills with carbon monoxide so there is no oxygen.
there is about a 6" cube of burning coals at the bottom of the chute.
Captain Caveman, what are some of the improvements you would do next time?
Man there is no love of the pellet in this thread! :icon_sleepy
I may too have bought my last Traeger! quote]
:biggrin:
The top of the chute (where you load the charcoal) has a door on it that seals air tight. the chute fills with carbon monoxide so there is no oxygen.
there is about a 6" cube of burning coals at the bottom of the chute.
The traditional horizontal log burner looks "sexy" and is a mainstay in the BBQ world. Without "reverse flow", the various temp zones can be used to your advantage. With "reverse flow" (ala Lang), you can have a larger area of even temps if that is what you want.
The "stacked" cookers with the fire in a chamber below and/or separated from the smoke chamber work very well.
TIM
SO where does the ash go? I may try this
Mike
Any downside to making the ash box bigger? Seems to me as along as it is sealed it should not matter
Mike