SirPorkaLot
somebody shut me the fark up.
Heck they even let ME sit at that table. Go figure
As all of you know me, if a Brethren is coming into NorCal, there is a spot at my table at Phat Matt's for any of you. Bo, that means you too.
Heck they even let ME sit at that table. Go figure
Hmph. What does a North Carolinian know about BBQ?
OK, This Alabamian is now ducking and covering...:bolt:
We only know enough about BBQ in NC to know beef ain't BBQ. Neither is grilling.
Torta, I've cooked Tri-Tips low and slow with good results, although I prefer reverse searing and smoking the meat during the indirect phase. Depending on how large the tri-tip is, that could be anywhere from 30-60 mins or more. Once the Tri reaches 110-120, I give it a good sear. This to me produces the best of both worlds. I get a noticeable smoke flavor as well as smoke ring, but the outer part of the meat has that wonderful crust you can only get with direct heat. I know this doesn't exactly answer your question, but I do hope it helps.
You can see an example here:
http://www.bbq-brethren.com/forum/showthread.php?t=120640
LOL Boy talking about opening up a can of worms. This is great stuff to read.
MAN!!! Ain't this thread a roller coaster of emotion!! Hoo-wee! I think someone got stabbed on page 2... might wanna check on em'!
Haw-haw! can of worms... the worm dude... worms... funny.
Alright, as for factual infor-mayshun, I have cooked a TT for 5+ hours and then seared, an it came out great!
Now, you noticed I said cooked, not smoked or grilled or bbq'd. I tried a lil' hill-billy sous vide on a tt and then moved it to the grill when it hit 115* IT, seared to 125*.
It was very tender, juicy and pink from the edge to the center with just the thinnest outer crust from the sear.
That being said, I've only done it once and prolly won't be doing it again. Not that anything went wrong with it or was bad about it, it was just missing the depth of grilled/smoked flavor that I expect and love. If it had been the first tt I'd ever tried, maybe I'd think differently, but it had more of a slightly grilled roast beef flavor than the tt I'm used to...
On the other hand I've smoked tt indirectly at 180* for a couple of hours and then cranked the heat and seared it, great results, but I'll use a little less wood the next time, the beefyness was a bit overpowered.
In both situations, and any time I cook tt, I never cook over 130... unless I screw up and go higher...
as others have said, I think the OP was lacking a little bit of detail - "cook a tt like a brisket" suggests that you would cook the piss outta it until 190+ or probe tender... and as others have said, really not a good idea to take a tt that high... a boneless skinless chicken breast cooked to 190 would prolly taste better, IMO!
You are gonna have to start paying me royalties if you continue to use the term "Asshat" :becky:
You are gonna have to start paying me royalties if you continue to use the term "Asshat" :becky: The next Brethren BBQ I have at my house will most definitely include a low and slow tri-tip, and perhaps we'll grind up another Waygu brisket for geed measure :thumb:
will there be Asshats?You are gonna have to start paying me royalties if you continue to use the term "Asshat" :becky: The next Brethren BBQ I have at my house will most definitely include a low and slow tri-tip, and perhaps we'll grind up another Waygu brisket for geed measure :thumb:
will there be Asshats?
Just remember to add some bacon to that wagyu grind cuz the last one sucked, so I heard...
will there be Asshats?
...I love the mouth feel of brisket. When I mentioned cooking a tri tip like a brisket I meant low and slow, for a long time. Obviously, a 10-12 hour cook would not work for a piece of meat 20% the size of a packer, but that doesn't mean you can't try cooking in the same manner.
I'm still a little unsure of what you mean when you say "cook it in the same manner as a brisket"
Are we talking just temps or closer to the same time too (time per lb of meat)?
Good questions:
Cooking Temps of around 250.
Will foil when I get a bark that I like.
Will add some broth as I do brisket.
Will attempt to cook to probe tender.
As for the mouth feel and flavor of brisket, why not cook brisket to have brisket and tri-tip to have tri-tip?
1. To see what happens to the tri tip in the process.
2. Because I already know what happens to brisket (And I like it...a lot).
3. Because I don't always want to cook a 12-15 pound slab of meat when
I can use a much smaller cut.
4. Because I like experimenting.
IMO it's kinda like asking if you can get rib steak to taste like tender loin... it's just not gonna happen, they (brisket & TT) come from totally different ends of the animal and are used differently by the animal. Kinda like the difference between skirt steak and flank steak, yeah the grain might look similar, but turn out completely different in texture & flavor... If you're looking for a faster brisket alternative, why not try a H&F brisky?
I didn't want to completely hijack this San Jose brothers cook so I'll just revive my old thread and
include his results.........
http://www.bbq-brethren.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123778
Apparently, you CAN cook a tri tip like a brisket just fine.:dancer::whoo:
Hmmmmm.......(Insert Eat CROW Low and Slow BBQ style Mod)