Reply from Tana II
I received permission from Tana to post her reply this morning. I believe that I had mentioned earlier that I would post it in it's entirety, but I have to leave just a bit off. She graciously included her phone number in case I had other questions and I don't think it would be right to post that. She also made some complimentary comments about the Brethren that were more of an aside than directly dealing with the questions at hand.
Before I post her response, let me acknowledge that there have been concerns about both an open and clandestine agenda regarding Tana and different 'factions' on the board. Although I am certainly cognizant of the politics and politicking involved, I believe that the original concerns in and of themselves were legitimate, regardless of how they were brought to light.
I also believe that no one should make any judgment without reading Tana's response. She was under no obligation to address these issues and seeing as how she has, I believe that any concerned party would relish the opportunity to hear the other side of the story.
As Tana doesn't frequent the Brethren forums, she is unlikely to respond to any follow up posts here. I'm concerned therefor that if others attempt to refute or provide perspective on her post, the entirety of the thread will be skewed. Sadly, I don't see a remedy for that other than keeping in mind that aside from this exception, the person in question won't be here to provide a counterpoint and that should be taken into consideration.
Aside from the two exceptions, here is her reply in it's entirety:
"Hi Eric, Thanks so much for coming to the source. I know there has been discussion surrounding that event and I am glad to respond.
First, to answer your question, yes, I did receive some remuneration for that event, and I disclosed that to the board.
Now I hope you'll bear with me as I give you some background on that event so you will know the full story.
In early February of 2009, I was approached by a friend (let's call him SS) who is primarily an MIM (not a current MBN) judge who wanted very much to have a barbecue contest in New Orleans simply because it is one of his favorite cities and one he visits often. Knowing that I was a successful contest organizer and that I always strive for excellence, he contacted me. SS knew a gentleman who he believed would be instrumental in organizing the contest contact me. At this man's request and expense, I sent to New Orleans and spoke with several people who would be involved if the decision was made to hold the event. I looked at sites and gave them my advice and information about what it would take to hold the event. After consideration, they decided it was too much for them to take on.
Within a few weeks, SS had another gentleman contact me about organizing a contest for New Orleans. After attending the contest in Mobile, AL, I visited with some friends in Pensacola for a couple of days, and then, at this man's request, a friend and I drove to New Orleans to meet with a second group of potential backers. This gentleman arranged for a room for one night. We looked at the site they wanted to use and told them that, although beautiful and convenient to the French Quarter (which is where their business are located) it was completely inadequate for a contest. This group did have an organizer for the event, but she was unavailable for over a year, so they decided to not pursue having the contest.
In May, a representative from the Morial Convention Center in New Orleans attended Memphis in May and met SS, who told this rep about his wish to hold a contest in New Orleans. The rep from the convention center was so excited about the possibility that he called me even before he left Memphis. He told me that in mid-August they were hosting an event called the Louisiana Tailgate Festival and asked if I would look at their site and talk with the promoter of the festival to see if we could hold a barbecue contest during the festival. In June, I went to New Orleans to meet with the promoter, the manager of the convention center and several other people who would be working on the festival. (In case you're wondering, they did pay for my flight and one night's lodging.) The site was well suited for a contest and the convention center was furnishing the staff and infrastructure for the festival, so at that meeting, they asked me if I would take charge of the barbecue contest, including getting the teams, judges, necessary volunteers, and making sure the contest was a success, and they offered compensation for my time and expertise, which I accepted. I do want to remind you here that most of our board members are contest reps, conduct judging classes, cooking classes, write books, etc. so there is certainly a precedent for members to utilize their individual areas of expertise for financial remuneration.
Because this specific event was timed too soon to receive sanctioning from KCBS, I submitted a request for it to be licensed and received the board's approval, and by late June or early July of 2009, I began sending out information to teams and judges about the event. I am proud to say that 28 teams attended The Big Easy Challenge in 2009, and everyone considered it a success for KCBS.
Although an expo and another contest was planned for 2010, the oil spill compelled the promoter and the convention center management to decide that other critical issues take precedence and the event for this past August was cancelled. I do want to make clear that in 2010, my remuneration for this event would have been limited to the normal compensation for KCBS reps.
Regarding your question #2. I believe I know where that came from, so I'll explain (briefly, if you can imagine). During the preparations for the 2010 event, the company that had been hired to work with vendors withdrew unexpectedly. When I heard about it, I made a statement in an email to one of the members on the Expo Planning Committee to the effect that "I was concerned, but didn't want to inform the KCBS board because vendors were expected to be a major part of the 2010 event and I didn't want anyone to panic." Eric, as I'm sure you understand, when planning an event, something unexpected will come up, and rather than creating concern unnecessarily, you just go with "plan B" and work things out, and in this case, another company was hired within days thus taking care of the problem. Obviously my comment got back to a board member who seized that comment as an opportunity to discredit me, and tried to accuse me of "keeping something major from the board." This was an over-reaction to my comment and was just taken too literally.
As an organizer Eric, I am sure you know that from time to time, there are people who may not be pleased with some of the decisions you must make when you plan your contest. It is simply impossible to keep every vendor, every sponsor, every team, and every judge ... even all of the public 100% satisfied with each of your decisions, and I believe that is one reason you may be hearing different versions of the same issue. Because I organized an event for over 15 years before my retirement, there are a very few people who resent some of the decisions I had to make and with which they did not agree. Even on the board, there are conflicts that, I believe, become personal, but that is simply a fact that must be accepted and we must all conduct the business of KCBS as we feel is correct and necessary.
I do apologize for the length of my response Eric, but, because you were considerate enough to contact me personally, I wanted you to know the full story. If I have done anything less than fully support the mission of KCBS, I am unaware. I love this society and its members and I would NEVER do anything to impune my integrity or to harm the KCBS in any way. I have sought and brought several new contests into our program and I will continue to do so as long as I am able.
I am proud to serve on the board, even with the stress and conflicts it sometimes brings, and I sincerely appreciate your coming to me."