Gene is the only one who can run
He told me he would seek reelection
It's been 3 years for Gene already?
Gene is the only one who can run
He told me he would seek reelection
I wasn't referring to your thread when I posted that but it is just as fitting. Stir away but if you want to be taken seriousl.......eh I'll just leave it at that I'm not looking to start a flame war. Carry on.
I find this very interesting as others reading these post should as well. Part of the pot stiring process is to get things off the bottom and see what comes to the top.
Something I and others have just learned about you is that you don't like to partisipate in things that you did not create or don't like. Anyone can go to the other post and see you only commented once in each of them and both had less than a positive tone about them. Yet you choose to cut post from both of them and paste them on the one you created and respond to them here rather than on the other two threads.
Your fellow running mates were partisipating in those post as well as others in a very positive direction. And I feel like they were taking it seriously. You see I am not the one who has to be taken seriously here because I am not running for the board, you are. You have managed to take something that was building momentum in a positive way and slow it down again. Don't be an energy vampire Steve just because you don't like what it is called. We have seen that happen to many times on the board already.
You need to learn to go with the flow of positive energy where ever it is. It makes no diffrence what it is called or who produced if it is producing positive results. :-D So get on the bus Steve and ride the energy wave.
Have a wonderful day:becky:
Or maybe I showed that if I don't like something I'm not just going to sit back and go with the flow as you say. I'm going to do something about it. I'm not looking to just hop on the bus I'm trying to change its direction. Thank you so much for pointing that out.I find this very interesting as others reading these post should as well. Part of the pot stiring process is to get things off the bottom and see what comes to the top.
Something I and others have just learned about you is that you don't like to partisipate in things that you did not create or don't like. Anyone can go to the other post and see you only commented once in each of them and both had less than a positive tone about them. Yet you choose to cut post from both of them and paste them on the one you created and respond to them here rather than on the other two threads.
Your fellow running mates were partisipating in those post as well as others in a very positive direction. And I feel like they were taking it seriously. You see I am not the one who has to be taken seriously here because I am not running for the board, you are. You have managed to take something that was building momentum in a positive way and slow it down again. Don't be an energy vampire Steve just because you don't like what it is called. We have seen that happen to many times on the board already.
You need to learn to go with the flow of positive energy where ever it is. It makes no diffrence what it is called or who produced if it is producing positive results. :-D So get on the bus Steve and ride the energy wave.
Have a wonderful day:becky:
Or maybe I showed that if I don't like something I'm not just going to sit back and go with the flow as you say. I'm going to do something about if. I'm not looking to just hop on the bus I'm tying to change its direction. Thank you so much for pointing that out.
I think you missed the point here. If it is headed in a positive direction why would you want to change that direction just because you don't like it? :shock:
I think you missed the point here. If it is headed in a positive direction why would you want to change that direction just because you don't like it? :shock:
I guess I'll have to explain it to you. I was using the bus as a metaphor for the KCBS. Stir away :boxing:
Absolutely support it! I would also rather see the board member be a liason to the committee he serves rather than the chair. Let members head the committees and run with it but report to a specific board member. This makes it to where powers are more spread out and no one gets too much of it. :thumb: Maybe a long term goal because that's a big change but I think in the long run, more beneficial to KCBS and the members.
It's been 3 years for Gene already?
Absolutely support it! I would also rather see the board member be a liason to the committee he serves rather than the chair. Let members head the committees and run with it but report to a specific board member. This makes it to where powers are more spread out and no one gets too much of it. :thumb: Maybe a long term goal because that's a big change but I think in the long run, more beneficial to KCBS and the members.
I am of the hopes that whoever is elected to the Board, that they can retain their ideals throughout their term, I hope that the new Board can all do what is best for the membership as a whole, I stand behind my votes and believe that every one of them was for the membership.
I sell nothing and have nothing to gain financially through the Board or BBQ in general, I just love the BBQ world. I have enjoyed my time as a cook, judge, rep, BBQ judging instructor and as a board member..
I hope that you will all vote for me again
I just re-joined KCBS to vote for the "Fab Four", good luck Steve, George, Jeff and Dave. You all have my votes.
I actually was not originally one of the MMA/Sam's event organizers, I filled in for Arlie who was sick at the time and could not attend this event as the organizer... I was filling in for him....... as far as I know, the attorneys determined that this was not a conflict, Sam's only wanted people (Board Members) who had the best interest of KCBS and Sam's Club at heart, there was also a requirement that the Organizers had the experience of 10 contests (successful) or more under their belt, that really limits the field....
There are some regional or state BBQ organizations that follow under more than one sanctioning body. Here is Louisiana, KCBS contests are in the strong minority. Why would I want to send the KCBS board a report on anything? If you want the KCBS-dominated local or regional groups to have some kind of representation within the structure of KCBS that is fine. In fact, that is a good idea all by itself. However, what about places where KCBS and its contests are in the minority? I think regional board spots make sense in that case. The old rule of thumb about KCBS is very true: the farther you are from KCMO, the less they care about you. Well friends, we are along way from KCMO......