Do you think any of these cookers puts out a better finished product than the others? They each have their advantages feature wise but when the cook is done, do you think one of these cooks better than the others?
Can not cook in the rain with a WSM. The water runs down the side of the cooker and into the bottom causing ash to be released ruining your cook.
I started with a PBC and, later, added a 22.5" WSM to the arsenal. At this point, I don't use the PBC anymore. In my experience, the food I cook on the WSM simply tastes better. I used to make a caveat that the PBC did really well on ribs and chicken. But, frankly, the ribs I do on the WSM turn out better. And for chicken, I can get great results on the WSM or a Weber Kettle. I really need to sell the PBC. It's a good little cooker and I credit it for getting me into smoking meats after many a fail on a cheap, big box, offset.
So weird Ribs and chicken come out 1,000x better on my PBC then my WSM or kettle. Maybe you don't like the grease hitting the coals and the flavor it imparts.