Be glad to, Ray. The non-disclosure agreement will be signed by directors and staff of KCBS. In my opinion, it should cover all discussions on all topics held in closed sessions present and past, live or recorded. It will cover matters that are "proprietary" to KCBS that only the staff know that shouldn't be in open discussion with anyone who doesn't need to know. . It's an extension of fiduciary responsibility. When someone is elected as a KCBS director, they have a duty to KCBS. Many times situations arise where personal motives, desires, ambitions and relationships conflict with that first duty to KCBS. A nondisclosure agreement is a physical reminder of personal responsibility to KCBS.
Thanks for answering. I do understand the need for NDAs and I sign them all the time.
But the real question was does this one go BEYOND the proprietery info. If I can interpret all of your answers I'd say that is still in discussion. I think limiting discussion of the open meeting with members is ridiculous.
This has a big feeling of Deja Vu for me. I can't help but feel this comes from somewhere besides Candy and I'm not talking about the lawyer.