Alexa RnQ
is One Chatty Farker
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2007
There's too much salad in that box. :wink:
But there's also eight ribs.
But there's also eight ribs.
My problem is with the use of the term "identifiable". That is a subjective and nebulous term. What if one or two judges can't see the rib cut lines? What does "identifiable" mean? All the judges can see them? The majority can see them? The table captain?
As a competition cook, I just don't see how you abide by the letter of this rule without separating your ribs enough to see daylight between them.
John
Yeah, it was a craptastic practice box, wasn't it? Thanks for rubbing it in, though. :wink: :-DThere's too much salad in that box. :wink:
But there's also eight ribs.
My problem is with the use of the term "identifiable". That is a subjective and nebulous term. What if one or two judges can't see the rib cut lines? What does "identifiable" mean? All the judges can see them? The majority can see them? The table captain?
As a competition cook, I just don't see how you abide by the letter of this rule without separating your ribs enough to see daylight between them.
John
OK. Sorry about not initially seeing the sarcasm.PD....my comment was meant to be ridiculous....just like not being able to see 6 ribs in a box when there was seven....surely everyone can count...if ribs aren't cut through clean, then that judge doesn't get a sample, then your DQ comes in to play...
There could have been a single inflorescence of parsley, and someone would bust your chops because "it's a meat contest".Yeah, it was a craptastic practice box, wasn't it? Thanks for rubbing it in, though. :wink: :-D
Bingo! To me it's about maximum heat retention and a natural look. You generally don't get served pre-cut ribs.To me, cut rib sides don't improve from air exposure.
You know, if this kind of rule-tightening continues, I can very easily see a day in the not too distant future where we all start taking pictures of our boxes for use as a sort of instant replay challenge. Is that a good thing?
John
I realize nothing is changed per above but still seems silly...How about just letting the judges select their pieces.. The, if the last judge(s) do not have a piece to select from, then it is clear that pieces are omitted and at that point could be scored down from the original appearance score.
Again, the way it has been done around here....I think it would be hard to visibly identify if the pieces are separated completely. Some times the judges don't know this till they pull them from the box and two pieces are stuck together.
Or my wife... if you do it upside-down!!Sorry, but what I understand is it is a BBQ competition. Not a meat comp, not a "salad contest", but a BBQ contest.
BBQ means a lot of different things to different people. If you could turn in a box with six pulled pork sliders with slaw and a tennessee red sauce you would get all 9's on my score sheet, but you probably would get all 2's on someone elses (if that turn in was legal)
I cook some IBCA contests too, and I have to agree that garnish in the box is not a favorite of mine, but since that's the KCBS way................... just let my wife do it for me:icon_blush:
Seriously, what's the big deal about cutting your ribs or brisket all the way through so each of the 6 judges can get a sample without having to pull it apart? If you don't think you need to, that's your problem, not KCBS's. This rule has not changed, at least since 2001. If you enter a contest and agree to the rules, you shouldn't complain.
It has nothing to do with cutting them all the way through. It has to do with them seeing 6 separately. you could have them cut through, but would take 4 out of 6 ribs or slices of brisket just to "take meat home
I haven't read anything but the first post...WTF? That rule has been in place for at LEAST four years. Why was it brought up? Better yet....why was it even posted? It's an established rule, nothings changed, what gives? Gimme a break.