I can tell a difference.
Here is an expeirment. Take a pork butt and cook till 170. Its not pullable is it. However it is considered done.
The experiment would prove that pork but is not pullable at 170. Which has nothing to to with either low and slow or hot and fast. I am not sure what you are saying here but it looks like this from your description. No rudeness intended but respectfully I do not see a correlation between house temp and Internal temp
Billy Bones once said it best. He often says things we have all been doing but puts it into words. He said "I like to get the meat (in this case he was talking about ribs) up to 170 as quickly and efficiently as possible... and that means a house temp of around [300-325 i can't remember where it was.
I apply this truth to brisket and so do the Meccas of Brisket. Now I was told the same thing by Roy Perez, Edgar Schmidt before he died in late 90's, Nena Schmidt Sells and Rick Schmidt when I bussed at the old Kreuz. The words specifically were from Roy (Now pitmaster at the New Kreuz) that as far as tenderness it is not what happens to the Brisket before the stall as it is after the stall. This means literally that people can nearly grill their briskets to a point and end up challenging the low and slow masters in texture, tenderness and flavor. Blacks, Angelos, Muellers all feel the same way. They can get a 15 pounder done to just short of the blade in sometimes 4 to 6 hours then they park them a long time, often in piles or at muellers and taylor cafe inside their sausage smokers (low, slow and low smoke).
Zions... to which I have a video coming up, I see smoke the crap out of them... bring them in the kitchen and place in the oven or turkey cooker for low and slow, then peel off the thick fat... and place BACK on the overly smokey pit for a time again... we all know they are good... I cannot confirm what their temp is because no one knows. I might volunteer for them though soon and find out. Now I will say this... the quality of wood they used was crappy stuff that looked to be waterlogged once and I would never use (but wow does it work for them).... also, they pretty much keep the firebox door open I think it was removed... so it has to be a hot temp. For those that want to creep up the collagen fat thing... this does not happen until the internal temp of the BRISKET reaches a point it begins to cry.
I had a person that lost my ashcroft 5 inch gauges on my Brazos Pit and we have been doing 30 briskets BY SOUND!!!!!!! Beginning our timing usually after severral hours when 30 briskets begin to weep their fat and the juices hit my static diverter body.... you know how you listen for when popcorn speeds up its detonation then slows down... it like that but reversed near the end... we literally listen to the sound of the briskets and when they begin to really weep (we listen at each door) we time maybe 2 to 3 hours and then bank or park them after that.
Please expand more on this. Also Grilling as said before has nothing to do with the thread at all... but its a common error. We are tlaking about hot and fast... not grilling. So your opinion would need to be based on a comparison of low and slow versus hot and fast not low and slow and grilling... or deep frying (which is my favorite way to cook ribs after they are smoked LOL)
Is having to do bbq low and slow a myth?
As to the person that said THE TYPE OF WOOD USED TO SMOKE HOT AND FAST MATTERS.... nothing truer has been said in this thread I will tell you. Smoking with briquets in my smoker (which uses about 60 pound in one smoke) produces more of a roast like brisket with a slight smoke tinge but a great ring.
But when I use say, live oak logs exclusively.... it taste like BBQ... PERIOD... there is and has been no debate.
TWO EXAMPLES
Against the grain has a good example, he and I belong to another charity org that does their smokes by the ton...., anyway they have this one oyler spinner smoker that they computerized and gassed up with a blower... now these 8000 lbs plus units are designed to plop 14 logs on and go for 18 hours on aspiration alone.... so when I saw this thing I looked at Jim and was like "this ought to be interesting"
Sure nuff, from what Jim said all that gas and blower made such a clean burn there was hardly any smoke flavor... plus the smoke there was was blow stright up the flue.
So he cut all that crap off and made some great cue again he told me.
Now also... Phil has mentioned several times that Myron Mixon of Jacks old south uses green wood I think and burns his Que with sickening white smoke all the time... but we all know his Que is wonderful. Perhaps Phil can tell us what he smokes at... Id like to know as I am not sure. But that is some great cue he makes