I
ihbobry
Guest
I don't think you can use # of members/contest to assess how hard/easy it is to win in a given area... Applying the total # of CBJ's into a % of total is not fair since it is very possibly that CBJ's are not the one's competing.
What KCBS doesn't show in these #'s is the breakdown of registered competition teams per state which is part of what would be needed to determine where the ideal concentration of contest locations should be. I would like to think demand would ultimately determine this.
Yes, I am cherry picking numbers, but I tried to keep them simple and honest.
I would have to believe % of CBJ's a simple (not perfect) way to get a feel for active interest/participation in the sport. Also it's reflective of perhaps better organization in the NE when it comes to finding, recruiting, retention and training.
I think contest to membership ratio would be a reasonable way to gauge competition level. (# of teams = a percentage of membership) I really doubt the NE has twice as many members per team than the national average. But I think it is reasonable to say for every x members there are y+/- teams.
Then if we have a feel for the number of teams, and the appearant fact that these teams regionally have half the number of contests to enter per member, and are judged by a higher percentage of CBJ's I'd say it's not unreasonable to conclude it's tougher to win here, and that those that do... I'ts like playing in the AL East.