Uncle Buds BBQ
is one Smokin' Farker
- Joined
- May 4, 2009
- Location
- Marietta...
"Too Much Blues Hog" ? :loco:
No such thing!!!!!!!!!!
"Too Much Blues Hog" ? :loco:
Ah yes, enter the judge bashers, for which the admin doesn't give a chit, since they're cooks too. No wonder this section of the forum is a failure. Insecure cooks who can't take honest criticism.
Ah yes, enter the judge bashers, for which the admin doesn't give a chit, since they're cooks too. No wonder this section of the forum is a failure. Insecure cooks who can't take honest criticism.
Sounds to me like 640—650 cooks blaming judges for their failures. See how that works? And you know damned well the comments were only aimed at inciting trouble. I refuse to be bullied by cooks. I'd rather talk BBQ, but I won't take mean spirited BS. There is no need for that.
You didn't say anything that disturbs me, except for taking BBQ home. Scores SHOULD reflect if an entry is too spicy or too hot, not tender enough, etc. I fail to see your rationale here. Are you saying judges shouldn't discuss entries after the cards go in?
And what does cooking a comp have to do with judging? Apples and oranges. That's like saying the NY Times food critic has to be a Michelin 2* chef. All that a judge needs to know is the rules, what good BBQ is, the common flaws found in BBQ, and be open minded. A style of BBQ may not be your preference, but personal preferences have no place in judging BBQ. I see an improvement in this -- some brave soul turned in a pork box recently that had a mustard based sauce. 9-9-9 from me, and it was the favorite of the table.
What secrets? That an entry has too much jalapeno powder on it? That it tastes like creosote? That it is so candied that you can't taste the meat? It is complaining to discuss what you found with an entry? Has BBQ turned that PC? I find BBQ becoming a universal style, losing the regional differences.
As far as taking BBQ home, I never have and I never will. It gets tiresome hearing that all judges are there for is free food. Nonsense. It costs me about $200 to go to an event. For that price, I can go to Stanley's BBQ in Tyler, or Pecan Lodge in Dallas eight times, and eat some damned good BBQ. Personally, I wish KCBS would ban taking food home altogether.
Now enter the judge bashers...
Ah yes, enter the judge bashers, for which the admin doesn't give a chit, since they're cooks too. No wonder this section of the forum is a failure. Insecure cooks who can't take honest criticism.
Sounds to me like 640—650 cooks blaming judges for their failures. See how that works? And you know damned well the comments were only aimed at inciting trouble. I refuse to be bullied by cooks. I'd rather talk BBQ, but I won't take mean spirited BS. There is no need for that.
Ah yes, enter the judge bashers, for which the admin doesn't give a chit, since they're cooks too. No wonder this section of the forum is a failure. Insecure cooks who can't take honest criticism.
See a farking moderator bashing a judge who was politely replying to comments until the usual judge bashes come in. What a bunch of losers. And you have no business being a moderator if you can't do it even handed. Disgusting.
You failed your moderator job, plain and simple. I just want to talk BBQ without the usuals like Dubagga, Burnt, and other judge bashers nipping at heels like cowardly little dogs.
Sounds to me like 640—650 cooks blaming judges for their failures. See how that works? And you know damned well the comments were only aimed at inciting trouble. I refuse to be bullied by cooks. I'd rather talk BBQ, but I won't take mean spirited BS. There is no need for that.
You didn't say anything that disturbs me, except for taking BBQ home. Scores SHOULD reflect if an entry is too spicy or too hot, not tender enough, etc. I fail to see your rationale here. Are you saying judges shouldn't discuss entries after the cards go in?
And what does cooking a comp have to do with judging? Apples and oranges. That's like saying the NY Times food critic has to be a Michelin 2* chef. All that a judge needs to know is the rules, what good BBQ is, the common flaws found in BBQ, and be open minded. A style of BBQ may not be your preference, but personal preferences have no place in judging BBQ. I see an improvement in this -- some brave soul turned in a pork box recently that had a mustard based sauce. 9-9-9 from me, and it was the favorite of the table.
What secrets? That an entry has too much jalapeno powder on it? That it tastes like creosote? That it is so candied that you can't taste the meat? It is complaining to discuss what you found with an entry? Has BBQ turned that PC? I find BBQ becoming a universal style, losing the regional differences.
As far as taking BBQ home, I never have and I never will. It gets tiresome hearing that all judges are there for is free food. Nonsense. It costs me about $200 to go to an event. For that price, I can go to Stanley's BBQ in Tyler, or Pecan Lodge in Dallas eight times, and eat some damned good BBQ. Personally, I wish KCBS would ban taking food home altogether.
Now enter the judge bashers...