R
Roo-B-Q'N
Guest
I just wanted to everyone know that I also sent a well-thought out e-mail to every member of the BoD regarding the 'nepotism' issue before the last BoD meeting. I received four e-mails in return, each thanking me for my opinion and my e-mail, and I was assured that it would be brought before the board.
While I vehemently do not agree with the proposed motion, I have to agree with the idea of WHY it was brought up. IF a large amount of KCBS members did bring this to a BoD member's attention (Troy or ANYONE else) then that BoD member should bring it before the BoD for discussion at least. Isn't that what we are all complaining about? Having the members voices HEARD at BoD meetings.
If that is what actually happened, then I can't be upset about it, as long as it was a good amount of members who had an issue with it. Personally, I have pledged to the NEBS membership (as part of my election and re-election platforms) that I would bring ANY issue back to our BoD so that they would have a better understanding of the general memberships opinion.
I don't think a 'call for resignation' would be appropriate at all if he was honestly and rightfully bringing member opinions to the BoD.
Honestly folks, I wasn't gong to send any e-mails or anything, I was going to just sit on my butt and watch to see what happened. UNTIL I saw Phil's post about it. If almost 500 of us did vote for Phil, then that seems to me to be a large percentage of the KCBS membership, even if it is regional.
The only way to get them to hear us is if we tell them. Write your e-mails and let them know how you feel.
Michelle, bringing it to the boards attention for discussion is one thing, putting a motion on the agenda for a vote is an entirely different thing.