• xenforo has sucessfully updated our forum software last night. Howevr, that has returned many templates to stock formats which MAY be missing some previous functionality. It has also fixed some boroken templates Ive taken offline. Reat assured, we are working on getting our templates back to normal, but will take a few days. Im working top down, so best bet is to stick with the default templates as I work thru them.

Preference of Ribs?

tractoman

Got Wood.
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
46
Reaction score
76
Location
Sonoma, CA
I have never slow cooked pork spare ribs, only baby backs and I am a little tired of them. What is the preference on ribs for slow cooking/smoking and is there a reason to do one type over the other? I am looking to branch out.
 
I have never slow cooked pork spare ribs, only baby backs and I am a little tired of them. What is the preference on ribs for slow cooking/smoking and is there a reason to do one type over the other? I am looking to branch out.

I like the marbling of spare ribs but absolutely hate spitting out the small round bones, so I usually go for baby backs.
 
I like them all have yet to tire of them, but I do prefer a simple dry rub of S&P and if I want to change things up I will put sauce on the table. If I want them leaner I will boil them in chicken broth with lot and lots of onion garlic powder and cracked pepper then finish them on a hot grill with my favorite sauce after I flip them the first time then one more flip to caramelize the sugars in the sauce. I know most will think boiling is blasphemous but the broth and onions is the key. Also total cook time boiling and finishing on the grill is under 2 hours.
 
I go back and forth, but stick with one variety long-term until something happens that makes me switch. Usually I get into some kind of rib funk with one variety, and then I switch to the other and think..."Man these are great! What have I been doing wasting my time with the other kind?" The cycle repeats every few months, I would say.

They have different texture, right? And spares definitely have more fat, so I think that lends to a slightly longer cooking time. Both are delicious when I am in the zone with either one.
 
I prefer full spares, but the convenience of ST Louis cut sometimes wins out on any given day.

St. Louis is also a good gateway off of baby backs
 
Either Baby Backs or St.Louis cut spares work for me. 2/2/1, 3/2/1 method works best.
 
I like the marbling of spare ribs but absolutely hate spitting out the small round bones, so I usually go for baby backs.

Trim them to St Louis, and that'll solve that problem.



I prefer St Louis spares, more fat, more flavor.
 
I'm all about the Spares
DSCF0197.jpg
 
I think for the amount of meat you get baby backs are a rip off. I like them but not for the price verses amount of meat.

I prefer spares cut st louis style. And during the week when no friends or family is over, the family and I enjoy rib tip dinners. Since Im from near Chicago originally I knew what rib tips were. I had to introduce the family to them. They love them!
 
My preference is (insert drum roll here) RIBS!!!

We bought baby backs last weekend cheaper than spares so that's what we ate, we aren't picky, meat, adhered to a bone... We're IN!
 
I like to take Spares and dress them into a St Louis cut, then I'll take the tips and smoke them as well. I like the St Louis cut much better than Baby Backs the extra effort is more than worth it to me.
 
Prefer spares because they are meatier and thus more forgiving if the cook is having an off day.
 
My preference is (insert drum roll here) RIBS!!!

We bought baby backs last weekend cheaper than spares so that's what we ate, we aren't picky, meat, adhered to a bone... We're IN!
Yes sir! back in the day i was all about spares. But, as I grow older I tend to lean towards LB's... At the end of the day I just want ribs:biggrin1:
 
Back
Top