• xenforo has sucessfully updated our forum software last night. Howevr, that has returned many templates to stock formats which MAY be missing some previous functionality. It has also fixed some boroken templates Ive taken offline. Reat assured, we are working on getting our templates back to normal, but will take a few days. Im working top down, so best bet is to stick with the default templates as I work thru them.

Firebox Question, Which Pit Would You Prefer?

Samichlaus

is one Smokin' Farker
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
668
Reaction score
1...
Location
North...
Name or Nickame
samichlaus
Two similar pits, both are made by Klose. Let's assume the size and options are the same. On one hand having the firebox under the pit seems logical, heat & smoke like to go up, not sideways. On the other hand you couldn't pre-heat your wood with-out the off set firebox.



30x30_upright.jpg


24x24_upright.jpg
 
The offset, but raise it up. I don't want to get down on my knees to tend a fire. Yes heat does travel up, but with proper design for air flow it will go where intended.
 
It doesn't matter with the pit shown, but with the offset, I can add wood from the top of the fire or have a grate directly above the coals for grilling. Can't with the offset shown here though as the top doos is lacking.
 
If you end up preferring the top design with offset (which is what I would choose), you might as well just get the MOAB (Phil's design - I can't find a pic).

If instead you end up preferring the "fire under" design, you might want to consider this one:

http://www.batespitts.com/ba70b.html
 
The offset is less efficient and loading from the top would spill an awful lot of heat...however, when using cookers of this size it wouldn't be a deal breaker. Also, preheating wood is not at all critical with well seasoned wood...again, not a deal breaker.

The top one is basically a big Bandera (it's not on a stand) and the bottom one is an uninsulated Spicewine/Stump's/etc. You have to remember that when you move up to heavy steel cookers your fire-
tending chores are greatly reduced due to mass.

I'd happily cook on either one of these cookers.
 
Load em both up and bring em here ... gimme a couple of years to try em out and I'll tell you which one works best. Deal?
 
spoon said:
If you end up preferring the top design with offset (which is what I would choose), you might as well just get the MOAB (Phil's design - I can't find a pic).

If instead you end up preferring the "fire under" design, you might want to consider this one:

http://www.batespitts.com/ba70b.html



http://www.bbq-brethren.com/modules.php?set_albumName=album33&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

I like the offset better. More convient, more versatile.
 
Offset gives you more options. I want a Spicewine or Stumps, but I like to burn sticks. In that case you can do both.
 
An offset could give you the option to open the fire-box lid and dump "bad smoke". Then again, you could just open the cooker door.
 
Hard choice,
traditional brick pits have the heat underneath but I would like the versitility of the off set. I believe the off set would take it. I would like to see it raised so you can tend the heat from a more comfortable height.
 
Back
Top