I am not a very happy camper! :x Let me tell you why. In the past, I have had problems getting a smoke ring on my meats using lump. Well, today is no exception. I know, most people say, to heck with the smoke ring as long as the food tastes great. Ok, the food tastes great, the texture is good but no smoke rings! No, I am not going to throw it out - I have to eat luch at work all week! :lol: But I am, none-the-less, mad as a toothless dentist!
I used Royal Oak - again!!! :? I used hickory chunks and apple wood - and plenty of it! I thought I might get a heavy smoke flavor (and I did) but I did not want to err on the side of being stingy with the wood - hey, thats what cold, rainy, snowy spring days are for right?

Lastly, my WSM temp was rock steady for 6 hours straight at 225* (thats 240* in the WSM lid) here, see for your self...
The chicken and the fatties got done in 4 hours... man they look good. The chicken was a bit smokey but I anticipated that. And I did not expect it to have a heavy smoke ring because it was boneless and skinless and would quickly reach 140* before a smoke ring could form; however, there was a very slight smoke ring but nothing send a note up to heaven and tell momma about!
The fatties looked as if they had not been smoked at all! They tasted great but no smoke ring...

Then there is the ribs - cooked 6 hours no foil at 225*. Tender - Check! Tasty - Check! Moist - Check! Smoke Ring - Not a chance! :roll:
Here are the ribs unglazed...

Here they are glazed...

And here they are in all of their ringless glory! There are a couple of shots of the ringless fatties too...


So, somebody tell me what the heck is up with cooking with lump! I never have this problem with Kingsford - but I despise the Kingsford ash! :x I want to use lump but if I can't get predictable outcomes I get antsy! I like consistency and predictability and if I have to use... gulp.... Kingsford to get that then I guess I have no other choice.
Tony