Yoder Wichita: My solution to its airflow/drafting issues

bbqpitsmoker

Full Fledged Farker
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
243
Reaction score
159
Points
0
Location
Tatooine
I am a Yoder Wichita customer, and have regularly experienced a range of issues related to how the pit drafts with symptoms including:

1. Smoke flowing backwards out of firebox intake damper instead of out of the stack

2. Inability to close the firebox door and maintain thin blue smoke out of the stack - within seconds of closing the door I typically get thick white smoke

3. Excessive fuel usage - The only option to achieve reasonable combustion and smoke quality has been to leave the firebox door open, and this approach wastes a lot of fuel via heat loss through the open firebox door.

4. The pit is in no way relaxing to use. Because of the insufficient draft the fire will regularly smoulder and even go out, which leaves soot on the food. I had regularly needed to come back every 15 mins or so to shift logs around to get them to burn, and occasionally even re-light a fire with kindling when the fire went out.

5. At times when the firebox door was left open to achieve combustion and the fire burned the logs down to coals, the large gaps in the expanded steel grate allows the coals to fall through the grate to the bottom of the firebox, and more than once I came back to a pit that was still reading a temp of 250F and upon opening the firebox found an empty charcoal grate with all the coals fallen through and then needed to build the fire again mid cook.


Similar to a few other forum members I decided to take on the challenge of trying to get the pit working the way I wanted it to, and am sharing my solution in the hope that it helps other Wichita customers be happier with their pit. Credit goes to the significant research done by Slamkeys - this research helped shape my thinking and approach here.


My goals/constraints for the modifications were:

1. The modifications need to be easily reversible in case I decide to sell the pit
2. No interest in cutting into the pit based on goal 1, but also in case the modification didn't work and I didn't want to be left in a worse position than I am now with an expensive pit.
3. I initially started off trying to get the pit working with the heat management plate installed but gave up. I found it limited the airflow too much, and to get the pit drafting to my liking would probably require cutting a new firebox air intake per Slamkeys approach previously posted here.
4. Conscious that one valid outcome is selling this pit and buying a different brand, so any solution needed to be cheap in terms of $ and also my time.
5. Didn't want to have to arrange for the pit to leave my house.


Modifications:

1. Completely block the upper firebox damper with a small flat piece of stainless steel sheet balanced between the door latch and the damper adjustment handle. This upper damper hole is far too high, and significantly contributes to the drafting issues.

2. Use the existing charcoal grate as a platform, for an additional surface to prevent coal prematurely falling through to the firebox floor. I initially used a sheet of perforated (not expanded) steel with something like quarter inch round holes evenly spaced throughout it, and after seeing how much of a positive difference it made I ended up having a charcoal basket fabricated that had a similar base to it. I use the basket for all fuels including log splits as well as charcoal. As well as the smaller holes on the base of the basket stopping coal falling through to prematurely lose the coal bed, the basket runs only half the width of the firebox so it helps me with the goal of running a small hot fire, as well as leaving room next to the basket to pre-heat splits (I have tried running cold splits as well and worked fine).

3. Replaced the chimney stack - A great feature of the Wichita is that the chimney stack is removable without any tools - it literally slides out. I did a bunch of research on drafting in smoker pits as well as wood burning stoves, and the thing that I saw again and again was people referring to the stack as the piece of the puzzle that generates the draft. Can't recall where but someone referred to the stack as the engine that pulls the air through the pit. I measured the stack as being approx 4" diameter, and 20" long, so had a replacement stack fabricated at 4" diameter and 40" long to 'increase the engine horsepower'.


The modifications listed above have left me significantly happier with the pit. I have used it in high wind blowing in various directions, and the smoke flows out the stack and doesn't reverse direction. The fuel burns steadily and at a slower rate. I easily achieve thin blue smoke and even shimmering vapor with the firebox door shut (and even remembering that the top intake damper is blocked), and can leave the pit for far longer without babysitting.

I previously had to start the pit with 2 charcoal baskets to achieve reasonable performance, and now I can start the pit without any charcoal at all.

My most recent fire lighting workflow in a car analogy was a standing start quarter mile sprint to see how hot I could quickly get it and maintain thin blue smoke:

No charcoal. Stacked a few small pieces of kindling with about 5 coke can width splits in the shape of a # above the kindling. Firebox door shut with top damper hole blocked. Lit the kindling and shut the top lid to the firebox. Within 25 minutes the pit went from ambient temperature to 350f on the temp gauge on the left of the firebox with a roaring fire and thin blue smoke out the stack.
 
It's nice that you were able to get the Wichita to work for you. It would be ironic if the fixes that Yoder comes up with matched what you did on your own. I'm a little surprised you were able to double the length of the smoke stack, which was basically a guess, and got it to perform so well. I've heard that even a quarter inch one way or another can make a difference. If the stack is too long, the smoke has a chance to cool before it can escape and it begins to flow back into the pit. Anyway, you did a great job at working the problem. I lack the skill and knowledge to address the problem so I would have sold it or hoped Yoder would come through with a much overdo fix.
 
Well done. Sad it had to come to this but nice to see you find a way to be happy with your cooker.
 
It's nice that you were able to get the Wichita to work for you. It would be ironic if the fixes that Yoder comes up with matched what you did on your own. I'm a little surprised you were able to double the length of the smoke stack, which was basically a guess, and got it to perform so well. I've heard that even a quarter inch one way or another can make a difference. If the stack is too long, the smoke has a chance to cool before it can escape and it begins to flow back into the pit. Anyway, you did a great job at working the problem. I lack the skill and knowledge to address the problem so I would have sold it or hoped Yoder would come through with a much overdo fix.

Just a 0.250" variance from any given length of a smoke stack won't make much of a difference. Besides, what is required for any column of air to be cooled to the point of lowering in the stack is dependent of constantly changing variables, not the least of which is humidity.
Any presence of air which is warmer than ambient will be less dense and will rise, but the rate can indeed slow.
Fortunately, there is, relatively speaking, considerable leeway in the length of a properly working stack or fireplace chimney, otherwise a calculation could be made for the perfect working length, but then the atmosphere surrounding the stack would be required to remain constant.
Stack length can be too short as well as too long to be effective for any given heat range and stack diameter, but the workable length component between the two will typically be greater than 0.250 for something as large as any smoker is sure to be. Doubling the length of the stack, if the original length was even partially effective, may very well have a dramatic influence on flow and velocity.
 
0.250" never seemed significant to me either which is why it struck me when Aaron Franklin said it does at around the 12:00 minute mark of the video below. After listening to it again however, I think he was referring the placement of the smoke stack rather than its length. He does discuss the importance of length around the 19:40 mark.

The link seems to come and go in my post. I don't know if there is a rule against posting YouTube videos or if it is a glitch. The video is called BBQ with Franklin - The Pits

BBQ With Franklin - The Pits - YouTube
 
Last edited:
:clap2::clap2::clap2:

So when are you going to permanently fix the door :-D

Do you mean so i dont have to use the stainless steel plate to block the damper? If so yep totally want to do that. Plan is to get a replacement damper wheel fabricated with the top hole missing to just bolt on to the door with existing hardware. Hopefully won’t cost too much.
 
Plan is to get a replacement damper wheel fabricated with the top hole missing to just bolt on to the door with existing hardware. Hopefully won’t cost too much.

I would hold off until you see the fix Yoder has come up with. It sounds like it isn't far off since current builds are starting to include the modification. With any luck, you might get it for free.
 
$2,000+ for a smoker that simply does not work. This would be my fix. I would be irate. Not sure why people continue to tolerate Yoder and come up with excuses for them. Even the $150 Char Broil guys don't have to come up with as many mods and excuses.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-09-28 at 10.00.37 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2017-09-28 at 10.00.37 PM.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 701
Is everyone who owns one of these pitts having trouble? I mean it is Oz, even the toilets swirl backwards when you flush :)

Larry
 
Silly me should have occured to me- the fire isn’t smouldering and going out because of drafting issues; its just them pesky kangaroos and koalas sneaking up and blowing out the fire........:icon_blush:
 
Can we get pics? I'm building a pit right now with almost the same dimensions as the Wichita except stack size. But I'm stumped on what to do with my air intake design.
 
Can we get pics? I'm building a pit right now with almost the same dimensions as the Wichita except stack size. But I'm stumped on what to do with my air intake design.

Glad to be any help I can be, however if you are looking for an air intake to use for inspiration (copy) I would suggest/plead/beg you not to copy that of the Wichita. From all accounts the horizon 20” pit has virtually identical dimensions and the air intake damper actually works without being modified. Personally though my favourite air intake is on the LSG offsets. It is a common sense design and mechanism and sits so low down on the firebox that it would really help to promote a natural draft.
 
Slamkeys is the thorn in Yoder side! He has written on this site and others and he has professional grade mods on his Wichita. Slamkeys, where are you amigo?!?
 
Do you mean so i dont have to use the stainless steel plate to block the damper? If so yep totally want to do that. Plan is to get a replacement damper wheel fabricated with the top hole missing to just bolt on to the door with existing hardware. Hopefully won’t cost too much.
You could have a piece of metal cut to fit the opening, same thickness. Then welded into the opening instead of a whole new wheel. Welded from the inside, you shouldn't even notice it once done. Just a thought.
 
You could have a piece of metal cut to fit the opening, same thickness. Then welded into the opening instead of a whole new wheel. Welded from the inside, you shouldn't even notice it once done. Just a thought.

Thats a really good idea. I may end up doing exactly that. thanks!
 
Glad to be any help I can be, however if you are looking for an air intake to use for inspiration (copy) I would suggest/plead/beg you not to copy that of the Wichita. From all accounts the horizon 20” pit has virtually identical dimensions and the air intake damper actually works without being modified. Personally though my favourite air intake is on the LSG offsets. It is a common sense design and mechanism and sits so low down on the firebox that it would really help to promote a natural draft.

The Horizon fire box is lower in relation to the cook chamber, than on the Yoder. On top of that, the Horizon intake vents are lower on the fire box than on the Yoder's. Together, these differences make for a great natural-draft smoker, a draft than can practically be started with nothing more than a kitchen match.

I believe Slamkeys has pretty much proven that lowering the intake, enough, on the Yoder product will result in sufficient draft; it's just sad that one would have to do so.
 
G'day bbqpitsmoker! How ya goin? (in my best Aussie accent)

I didn't notice your new thread pop up. I've seen your fire basket thread and agree it's tough to keep the coals where you want them with the factory grate. I still need to give your solution a whirl to see if it works better than what I'm doing now. I normally have 2 grates stacked together to keep the coals from falling through, but I still have trouble keeping the coals confined to a small space when I push the logs around.

Your basket solution might be the most efficient way to keep a small hot fire going with the least amount of effort and fuel. However, I've been pondering some of the things Joe Phillips said lately about intentionally generating smoke for flavor, and it's caused me to wonder if my fires are burning so cleanly now that I might be sacrificing flavor while focusing on how clean my fires are. Does that make sense? I've had some cooks when things were working so well I basically had no smoke for 90% of the cook, and that could be more like cooking with pure charcoal than cooking with splits.

The smoke stack mod is interesting, and several people suggested I try using a larger one too (either bigger diameter ala Jambo, or longer). At the beginning, I relied on Feldon's calculator to see if it agreed with the design decisions used for the Wichita, and was surprised that it did indeed come very close. Joe Phillips wouldn't admit to using it as a basis for their designs, as if they are using some old family tradition to design their pits, but I believe they are using it to some extent.

Anyway, from what I remember the Feldon calculator said a cooker the size of a Wichita with a 4" smoke stack required a length of 26" or so, and my Wichita smoke stack was 20" vertically and 6" horizontally, which was basically spot on. This is why I never messed with the smoke stack. I'm curious to see what kind of smoke stack Aaron Franklin puts on his new backyard smokers when they release next year, because he likes large-diameter stacks.

I believe the heat management plate, coupled with the high firebox mount position, is the main culprit here because the original Wichita smokers didn't have one (see this post: http://community.yodersmokers.com/viewtopic.php?p=8960#p8960). Did you completely stop using it? Coincidentally, I attempted a cook this past weekend without the heat management plate, and I simply could not get the temperatures below 300F on the cool side and 350F on the hot side with the plate removed. Maybe you are able to control your temps better using the fire basket because you can maintain a much smaller fire that way. I think the biggest problem with not using the heat management plate is the heat goes straight to the top of the smoker and out the smoke stack, leaving the bottom of the cooker much cooler, and preventing much of the smoke from contacting the food when it's on the main cooking grate. Aaron Franklin intentionally mounts his smoke stacks at grate level for this very reason, because he believes it forces the smoke to flow right over the meat. It's all theory though, so who's to say which theory is right or wrong - whatever works is the right way.

One thing Joe Phillips said in defense of his high fire box mounting position is that he intentionally mounts the firebox one inch above the center line of the main cooker in order to create the maximum opening between the chambers. Well, I'm not sure why that is necessary, especially if you're going to block it all off with steel plates anyway:
WB71bHYl.jpg
 
G'day bbqpitsmoker! How ya goin? (in my best Aussie accent)

I didn't notice your new thread pop up. I've seen your fire basket thread and agree it's tough to keep the coals where you want them with the factory grate. I still need to give your solution a whirl to see if it works better than what I'm doing now. I normally have 2 grates stacked together to keep the coals from falling through, but I still have trouble keeping the coals confined to a small space when I push the logs around.

Your basket solution might be the most efficient way to keep a small hot fire going with the least amount of effort and fuel. However, I've been pondering some of the things Joe Phillips said lately about intentionally generating smoke for flavor, and it's caused me to wonder if my fires are burning so cleanly now that I might be sacrificing flavour while focusing on how clean my fires are. Does that make sense? I've had some cooks when things were working so well I basically had no smoke for 90% of the cook, and that could be more like cooking with pure charcoal than cooking with splits.

The smoke stack mod is interesting, and several people suggested I try using a larger one too (either bigger diameter ala Jambo, or longer). At the beginning, I relied on Feldon's calculator to see if it agreed with the design decisions used for the Wichita, and was surprised that it did indeed come very close. Joe Phillips wouldn't admit to using it as a basis for their designs, as if they are using some old family tradition to design their pits, but I believe they are using it to some extent.

Anyway, from what I remember the Feldon calculator said a cooker the size of a Wichita with a 4" smoke stack required a length of 26" or so, and my Wichita smoke stack was 20" vertically and 6" horizontally, which was basically spot on. This is why I never messed with the smoke stack. I'm curious to see what kind of smoke stack Aaron Franklin puts on his new backyard smokers when they release next year, because he likes large-diameter stacks.

I believe the heat management plate, coupled with the high firebox mount position, is the main culprit here because the original Wichita smokers didn't have one (see this post: http://community.yodersmokers.com/viewtopic.php?p=8960#p8960). Did you completely stop using it? Coincidentally, I attempted a cook this past weekend without the heat management plate, and I simply could not get the temperatures below 300F on the cool side and 350F on the hot side with the plate removed. Maybe you are able to control your temps better using the fire basket because you can maintain a much smaller fire that way. I think the biggest problem with not using the heat management plate is the heat goes straight to the top of the smoker and out the smoke stack, leaving the bottom of the cooker much cooler, and preventing much of the smoke from contacting the food when it's on the main cooking grate. Aaron Franklin intentionally mounts his smoke stacks at grate level for this very reason, because he believes it forces the smoke to flow right over the meat. It's all theory though, so who's to say which theory is right or wrong - whatever works is the right way.

One thing Joe Phillips said in defense of his high fire box mounting position is that he intentionally mounts the firebox one inch above the center line of the main cooker in order to create the maximum opening between the chambers. Well, I'm not sure why that is necessary, especially if you're going to block it all off with steel plates anyway:
WB71bHYl.jpg


Hi Slamkeys,

Feel grateful for your expert opinion in my humble thread....

1. Re smoke being too clean, I would never ever worry about that. As long as I am cooking with wood and not just a charcoal base, my goal is the cleanest stack possible, and the flavour takes care of itself. There is no rule that says that the delicious by product of combustion must be visible in smoke; in fact some of my tastiest results have been from a cook that maintained shimmering vapour - the shimmering vapour is definitely not just air and has considerable deliciousness from the log combustion in it which produces a very different result from using just charcoal.

Here is a recent Brisket cook that I did with a very clean stack. It tasted great but I threw out the whole 15 pound brisket in the trash because of the obviously undercooked area on the edge of each slice..... :-D

2a9xx08.jpg
[/IMG]

2. Yes - have completely stopped using the HMP

3. Re temp - The cooker in its current configuration definitely likes to run at a higher temp. I would say that average cruising temp with a small pile of coal from splits that have burned down, and a fresh split on top would be around 300F on the left side temp gauge. One thing I will say is that there is a big difference between the gauge temp and grate temp because I agree with you that the airflow runs higher in the cook chamber so a 300F temp gauge reading might relate to 250F at the main grate a few inches below so I use the gauge reading as a relative measure of what the grate temp would be rather than an an exact measurement. I only use the main grate (don't like the radiant heat from the top of the cook chamber drying out the food on the 2nd level grate that would sit closely to the top of the cook chamber). For any cooks where I want more precision I use a thermoworks Smoke at grate level.

4. Re: Chimney, the stack size increase makes a massive improvement. I would encourage anyone with this pit to do it. From seeing the vapour exit from the top of it you would think there was a guru pushing air through the pit, but there isn't. Its just the air draft, but its not just a gradual leak of smoke it works more like a Jambo or similar, it MOVES that air which is taken from just the bottom half of the original air intake.
 
This was my last brisket with the heat management plate installed. Big smoke ring, fully rendered fat on the point, and some amazing burnt ends from the Plowboys Bovine Bold rub. I've been using butcher paper to wrap after I hit the stall, then pulling off when the temperature gets between 200-203 before moving to a cooler to rest for a couple of hours before I serve. I might do another one tomorrow since the weather is supposed to be nice.
iWMYVIl.jpg
 
Back
Top