wire-it-up
is one Smokin' Farker
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2015
- Location
- Mishawak...
Greetings Brethren. After dealing with my low and slow addiction for about 5 years now, I've come to realize that chuck roast is my favorite thing to cook and to eat. I follow the methods of a well known pit master pretty much religiously. However, I have found that his recommended finishing temp for chuckies isn't high enough to get consistent "fall apart" tenderness. He says to take it to 195-200 IT. But when I pull them from the smoker in that range and let them rest an hour, one muscle will be very tender, and the other one not so much.
Yesterday's cook was 5 chucks of various sizes. Three of them were manager's special, so half price. It wouldn't all fit in one pan, and the top of the Humphrey's seems to run slightly hotter than the bottom. I discovered this because the probe was in a roast on the top rack, and when it reached the suggested IT, I took it off and let it rest. I moved the meat that was on the bottom to the top, and put the probe in one of the roasts in the second pan. It had another 15-20 degrees to go. After the 1 hour rest, I shredded the first pan of meat. As has happened a few times before, I wasn't thrilled with the tenderness. So I let the second pan go to 207. That made all the difference in the world. Every fiber just crumbled in my hands. So much easier and faster to shred that way, not to mention easier to chew. None of the meat in the first pan was what I would call "tough", but just not as tender as I like, particularly given the time investment for a low and slow cook (about 6 hours at 250 on these - half the time exposed to smoke and the other half panned in broth, covered with foil).
I really need to start a BBQ journal, and make notes about things like this. I seem to forget that I need to take chucks hotter when following that recipe.
I was curious as to the "done" IT the Brethren take their chuckies to before pulling.
Yesterday's cook was 5 chucks of various sizes. Three of them were manager's special, so half price. It wouldn't all fit in one pan, and the top of the Humphrey's seems to run slightly hotter than the bottom. I discovered this because the probe was in a roast on the top rack, and when it reached the suggested IT, I took it off and let it rest. I moved the meat that was on the bottom to the top, and put the probe in one of the roasts in the second pan. It had another 15-20 degrees to go. After the 1 hour rest, I shredded the first pan of meat. As has happened a few times before, I wasn't thrilled with the tenderness. So I let the second pan go to 207. That made all the difference in the world. Every fiber just crumbled in my hands. So much easier and faster to shred that way, not to mention easier to chew. None of the meat in the first pan was what I would call "tough", but just not as tender as I like, particularly given the time investment for a low and slow cook (about 6 hours at 250 on these - half the time exposed to smoke and the other half panned in broth, covered with foil).
I really need to start a BBQ journal, and make notes about things like this. I seem to forget that I need to take chucks hotter when following that recipe.
I was curious as to the "done" IT the Brethren take their chuckies to before pulling.