midwest_kc
is one Smokin' Farker
So, I've started down a path of analyzing our scores for the year (and last year to check for trends) based on the individual judges scores, as opposed to the larger number. I'm analyzing 9,8,7, etc from each judge for each contest we cooked. I'm wondering if anyone else has done this, and any tricks or insights people have taken from it.
The numbers, naturally, are averaging out into the 8.xxx for everything, which is to be expected. Obviously higher is better, but I'm trying to find some insights on if anyone looks at this this way, or if I am (probably) getting too deep and not seeing the forest for the trees.
What do you guys do to evaluate scores? I know there's regional differences that keep a comparative standpoint from being useful, but just some generalities would be nice.
Man, winter is kicking in before I'm even done with this season!
The numbers, naturally, are averaging out into the 8.xxx for everything, which is to be expected. Obviously higher is better, but I'm trying to find some insights on if anyone looks at this this way, or if I am (probably) getting too deep and not seeing the forest for the trees.
What do you guys do to evaluate scores? I know there's regional differences that keep a comparative standpoint from being useful, but just some generalities would be nice.
Man, winter is kicking in before I'm even done with this season!