MMMM.. BRISKET..
The BBQ BRETHREN FORUMS.  



Our Homepage Donation to Forum Overhead Welocme Merchandise Associations Purchase Subscription Amazon Affiliate
Go Back   The BBQ BRETHREN FORUMS. > Discussion Area > Q-talk

Notices

Q-talk *ON TOPIC ONLY* QUALITY ON TOPIC discussion of Backyard BBQ, grilling, equipment and outdoor cookin' . ** Other cooking techniques are welcomed for when your cookin' in the kitchen. Post your hints, tips, tricks & techniques, success, failures, but stay on topic and watch for that hijacking.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-19-2022, 12:41 PM   #1
FB_BBQ
Got rid of the matchlight.
 
Join Date: 01-17-22
Location: Farmers Branch Texas
Name/Nickname : Jeffrey
Default Offset smoker stack size question

I am looking into offset smokers. One of the finalists is a reverse flow 20" diameter by 34" long "Compact Patio Smoker" by Johnson.

https://johnsonsmokers.com/compact-patio/

Instead of one stack, it has two 3" stacks (each 30" long). They do offer some customization and I am wondering about requesting 3.5" stacks instead.

It seems like Franklin and lots of others suggest about a 5" diameter stack for a smoker this size. With a 5" diameter pipe, the inner diameter would be 4.75" and the area of a cross section would be 17.72sqin. With dual 3" stacks, the combined cross section area is 11.89sqin (and two smaller pipes don't flow as well as one larger one). Going up to 3.5" pipe, the area rises to 16.59sqin. Any idea how much a dual-stack matters or that it is a reverse-flow smoker?


-OD- -ID- -Single- -Dual-
3.00" 2.75" _5.94" 11.89"
3.50" 3.25" _8.30" 16.59"
4.00" 3.75" 11.04"
5.00" 4.75" 17.72"
5.63" 5.38" 22.69"


Am I overthinking this? Thoughts?


Last edited by FB_BBQ; 01-19-2022 at 01:34 PM..
FB_BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote




Old 01-19-2022, 02:16 PM   #2
Cat797
is one Smokin' Farker
 
Cat797's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-15-13
Location: Central IL
Name/Nickname : Ed
Default

I'd ask for a single 5" stack. Why make it complicated? I don't want to fiddle with two different stack dampers etc.
__________________
Yoder YS640 - Weber 22.5" Performer - Hunsaker DIY - XL Big Green Egg
Cat797 is online now   Reply With Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Thanks from:--->
Old 01-19-2022, 02:56 PM   #3
rque
On the road to being a farker
 
Join Date: 05-11-21
Location: Rochester, NY
Name/Nickname : Ray
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cat797 View Post
I'd ask for a single 5" stack. Why make it complicated? I don't want to fiddle with two different stack dampers etc.
Agreed, if you’re going to have modifications made see if you can get a wider single stack.
__________________
Weber E-335, Weber 22”, Weber SJ, PBJ, Workhorse Pits 1969 Wagon
rque is offline   Reply With Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-19-2022, 03:54 PM   #4
TheHojo
is One Chatty Farker
 
Join Date: 12-24-09
Location: Dallas, Tx
Name/Nickname : Ted
Default

I just sold my Johnson Smoker - same one you are thinking of purchasing, but it also had the vertical chamber above the firebox.

Mine ran like a champ - but I always kept the "trap door" open between the horizontal and vertical cook chambers - so ran mine with 3 stacks wide open - the two in the horizontal chamber and the one in the vertical chamber.
__________________
Blue Collar Smoker by Big Phil
Weber Kettle 22'' and Custom Table
Direct Heat Smoker by Royale BBQ Fabrication
Johnson Smoker Compact Ultimate Patio - retired
Brinkmann Stillwater - retired
Old Smokey 18'' - retired
TheHojo is online now   Reply With Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-19-2022, 03:55 PM   #5
SmoothBoarBBQ
is One Chatty Farker
 
Join Date: 02-25-17
Location: Killeen, TX
Name/Nickname : Donnie
Default

Proud Johnson Smokers owner here (and have a new one being built right now). The reason there are two stacks is so that the heat and smoke are pulled evenly across the cooking chamber. The stacks are spaced on each particular smoker so that everything works properly.

If you take a look at some of the larger smokers you'll see the stacks are mounted through the top, rather than the side like his smaller smokers. One of those stacks lines up with the bottom rack inside the cook chamber, and the other lines up with the upper cooking racks. This way the heat and smoke are pulled evenly across both the upper and lower grates.

I've never heard of anyone having any drafting issues with a Johnson Smoker. I'm sure he'll adjust the stack sizes if you request it, but from my experience with Johnson Smokers there's really no need to do so.
__________________
Weber Kettle, Johnson Smokers Med 6', Cotton Gin "Harvester" UDS
SmoothBoarBBQ is online now   Reply With Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Thanks from:--->
Old 01-19-2022, 04:25 PM   #6
Nash
Is lookin for wood to cook with.
 
Join Date: 02-15-21
Location: Eastern Canada
Name/Nickname : Nash
Default

I can't remember what was in Franklin's book for recommendations, but his pits have a 4" stack on them, the chamber is about 20x40" I think. But that's a straight-through offset rather than a reverse-flow.


A quick look at the Johnson reverse-flow shows both stacks at the same height, which is a similar idea as a smoke "collector" or "plenum" but executed in a different way. At the end of the day, the dual stacks are to decrease one central (center of grate at exit point) spot of high convection/hotspot that you'd get with one larger stack.



Also worth noting is that the pipe diameter can vary a fair bit, depending if it's schedule 10, 40, or 80, and so on. On a recent build I sourced schedule 10 6" pipe; it's actually 6.4" ID.







Quote:
Originally Posted by FB_BBQ View Post
I am looking into offset smokers. One of the finalists is a reverse flow 20" diameter by 34" long "Compact Patio Smoker" by Johnson.

https://johnsonsmokers.com/compact-patio/

Instead of one stack, it has two 3" stacks (each 30" long). They do offer some customization and I am wondering about requesting 3.5" stacks instead.

It seems like Franklin and lots of others suggest about a 5" diameter stack for a smoker this size. With a 5" diameter pipe, the inner diameter would be 4.75" and the area of a cross section would be 17.72sqin. With dual 3" stacks, the combined cross section area is 11.89sqin (and two smaller pipes don't flow as well as one larger one). Going up to 3.5" pipe, the area rises to 16.59sqin. Any idea how much a dual-stack matters or that it is a reverse-flow smoker?


-OD- -ID- -Single- -Dual-
3.00" 2.75" _5.94" 11.89"
3.50" 3.25" _8.30" 16.59"
4.00" 3.75" 11.04"
5.00" 4.75" 17.72"
5.63" 5.38" 22.69"


Am I overthinking this? Thoughts?

Nash is offline   Reply With Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-20-2022, 08:58 AM   #7
FB_BBQ
Got rid of the matchlight.
 
Join Date: 01-17-22
Location: Farmers Branch Texas
Name/Nickname : Jeffrey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nash View Post
I can't remember what was in Franklin's book for recommendations, but his pits have a 4" stack on them, the chamber is about 20x40" I think. But that's a straight-through offset rather than a reverse-flow.


A quick look at the Johnson reverse-flow shows both stacks at the same height, which is a similar idea as a smoke "collector" or "plenum" but executed in a different way. At the end of the day, the dual stacks are to decrease one central (center of grate at exit point) spot of high convection/hotspot that you'd get with one larger stack.



Also worth noting is that the pipe diameter can vary a fair bit, depending if it's schedule 10, 40, or 80, and so on. On a recent build I sourced schedule 10 6" pipe; it's actually 6.4" ID.
Were are you finding that Franklin's stack is 4" diameter? I have looked and cannot find that info. In his book he only offers that, for a smaller backyard smoker, 4" is the absolute minimum with a height of 3'-4'. He also says he errors on too much draw with a damper to slow it down if needed (p. 59 of the manifesto).
FB_BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-20-2022, 02:14 PM   #8
sandro
Full Fledged Farker
 
Join Date: 02-18-21
Location: Rome, Italy
Name/Nickname : sandro
Default

I believe Franklin's backyard pit is 4.5", Mill Scale's 4"
__________________
🔥 Cactus-Jack 16x36 Tel-Tru gauge & Franklin baffle
🔥 Pit Barrel Cooker temp gauge & 2x4" exhaust pipe
🔥 PkGrills PKTX
🇺🇸 Insta @sandrobbq
🇮🇹 YouTube sandrobbq
sandro is offline   Reply With Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Thanks from:--->
Old 01-20-2022, 06:00 PM   #9
Nash
Is lookin for wood to cook with.
 
Join Date: 02-15-21
Location: Eastern Canada
Name/Nickname : Nash
Default

Not sure where I gleaned it from but I've seen or read it on YouTube vids, or in comments, or on forums. Wilson's bbq on YouTube mentions it's 4.5", but I'm pretty sure that's the O.D. measurement. 4" schedule 40 pipe is 4.5" O.D. and 4.1" I.D.



It also looks smaller to me, I have an offset with 20" diameter chamber and a 5" sch 40 stack, and it's definitely fatter to the eye.
Nash is offline   Reply With Quote


1 members found this post helpful.
Thanks from:--->
Old 01-20-2022, 08:12 PM   #10
busmania
On the road to being a farker
 
Join Date: 07-07-18
Location: Centennial co
Name/Nickname : Matt
Default

I put a 5” (inside diameter) Stack on my 24” x 54” direct flow and it is plenty big. I think too much flow is as bad as too little but that’s just me and I also don’t build reverse flow so I’m not as familiar with that. Gotta find a sweet spot.
busmania is offline   Reply With Quote


Thanks from:--->
Old 01-20-2022, 10:14 PM   #11
FB_BBQ
Got rid of the matchlight.
 
Join Date: 01-17-22
Location: Farmers Branch Texas
Name/Nickname : Jeffrey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by busmania View Post
I put a 5” (inside diameter) Stack on my 24” x 54” direct flow and it is plenty big. I think too much flow is as bad as too little but that’s just me and I also don’t build reverse flow so I’m not as familiar with that. Gotta find a sweet spot.
I agree that it can be too big, but you can always use a damper if it is too big. Can't really adjust one larger (although i guess you can always make the stack longer).
FB_BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-21-2022, 06:11 AM   #12
Nash
Is lookin for wood to cook with.
 
Join Date: 02-15-21
Location: Eastern Canada
Name/Nickname : Nash
Default

Here's a couple snaps of my 20"x36" with the 5" sch 40 stack (5.1" ID) I realized once I saw it mounted that I should have went with a 4". All good though, it makes it look beefy and I added a damper, so all is well.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg stack 3.jpg (80.1 KB, 111 views)
File Type: jpg stack 1.jpg (91.1 KB, 107 views)
Nash is offline   Reply With Quote


2 members found this post helpful.
Thanks from:--->
Old 01-24-2022, 09:34 AM   #13
FB_BBQ
Got rid of the matchlight.
 
Join Date: 01-17-22
Location: Farmers Branch Texas
Name/Nickname : Jeffrey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nash View Post
Here's a couple snaps of my 20"x36" with the 5" sch 40 stack (5.1" ID) I realized once I saw it mounted that I should have went with a 4". All good though, it makes it look beefy and I added a damper, so all is well.
Wow! I know the Old County Brazos has a 5.625" (OD) stack and this looks even bigger!
I have been assuming that Johnson's spec of 3" stacks means the OD is 3". If it is actually the ID, then I think it'd be fine.
FB_BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Forum Custom Search: Enter your Search text below. GOOGLE will search ONLY the BBQ Brethren Forum.
Custom search MAY not work(no display box) in some configurations of Internet Explorer. Please use compliant version of Firefox or Chrome.







All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2003 -2012 © BBQ-Brethren Inc. All rights reserved. All Content and Flaming Pig Logo are registered and protected under U.S and International Copyright and Trademarks. Content Within this Website Is Property of BBQ Brethren Inc. Reproduction or alteration is strictly prohibited.
no new posts