And in my opinion, they are more than "necessary" -- they are the reason I will go to a particular contest, or not.IMO CBJs are not necessary
Yes, good BBQ will rise to the top. We've been fortunate enough to cook well across two sanctioning bodies this past year. But the fact remains that a team must cook differently to please "judges" from the general public who think boiled Chili's and mushy McRibs are the bomb, than they do for a Master CBJ.
Contests/organizers that make lackluster or nonexistent efforts to recruit experienced judges will not see me return. Contests that rely on holding a judging school the night before a contest to make up their "100% CBJs" will not be at the top of my list of places I want to compete again.
Too much goes into our product to not care whether any attempt has been made to educate the judges to a common standard. Do teams deserve something more? Yes, and that's why we value experienced judges so highly. Do I think it could be better than that? Absolutely, through apprenticeship and continuing education.
To become a Certified Beer Judge you have to take a series of classes and then pass a difficult test. Plenty of people are willing to go through the hassle of getting certified. And the reality is that it costs less than $100 to brew a beer that will be judged. It can cost several hundreds to participate in a BBQ contest. Doesn't it make sense that people who spend that kind of money have judges who have REAL training?
This is tremendously interesting, to hear how other sanctioning bodies train judges. Following that model, wouldn't it make sense to have a class entirely on each of the four meats?
There's a HUGE amount of information a prospective new BBQ judge has to absorb, so many variables in how the meat can present, and it's just human nature that nobody's going to sponge it all up and apply it correctly in one go. It seems like either splitting up the category classes, or establishing continuing education, would make sense.