I'm conferring with my advisors now, and may have a press conference later.
Time to stir the kcbs bod pot again!!
- Thread starter Tarheel
- Start date
I'm conferring with my advisors now, and may have a press conference later.
Plowboy
somebody shut me the fark up.
<---- 99% er
Ever wonder if Herman Cain is a KCBS judge? Where else did he come up with 9,9,9?
BTW, I was groped (reach around) by one of the BOD candidates in 2007. Press conference pending.
Plowboy
somebody shut me the fark up.
For some reason I see you taking a different route. I see a watchtower in your future.
And 4' of Type III 550 paracord.
The G-String you bought me at Qlossal made me feel very uncomfortable. I'm retaining Gloria Alred <or however you spell her name>.
Plowboy
somebody shut me the fark up.
If you are going after the Plowboy fortune... you could probably buy a Happy Meal with what I've got.
I'm making you a new paracord thong. Be prepared!
Slamdunkpro
Babbling Farker
dmprantz
is Blowin Smoke!
I'm a bit late to this party, and I'll admit I skimmed through some of the posts, but I had a few things I thought I should say:
In post #7, it was stated that none of the candidates in "the ticket" stand to gain from contest assignments. Isn't at least one of the candidates an organizer who has publically complained about not having a chance to organize a Sam's Club event? I am in no way trying to say that any one on the ticket would take advantage, but it is certainly possible, isn't it?
There was a lot of talk about judges shadowing cook teams and whether or not it should be required of all judges. Here's a random thought: Why not ask judges on the application: Are you a KCBS competition cook? Have you ever shadowed a KCBS cook team? When was the most recent shadow? Let the organizers play favourites with those judges if they want, just like they can now play favourites with Master CBJs, and then distribute them evenly among tables.
Then, in Post 137, George said that Judge 6 is farthest from the norm. This is not necessarily true. It is very likely that your scores are on the order of 36 33 33 33 33 32. The lowest is statistically more significant than the highest....Maybe I've been writing too many standard deviation routines lately....Maybe STD should be taken into account of tie breakers? (I'm really kidding there!)
dmp
In post #7, it was stated that none of the candidates in "the ticket" stand to gain from contest assignments. Isn't at least one of the candidates an organizer who has publically complained about not having a chance to organize a Sam's Club event? I am in no way trying to say that any one on the ticket would take advantage, but it is certainly possible, isn't it?
There was a lot of talk about judges shadowing cook teams and whether or not it should be required of all judges. Here's a random thought: Why not ask judges on the application: Are you a KCBS competition cook? Have you ever shadowed a KCBS cook team? When was the most recent shadow? Let the organizers play favourites with those judges if they want, just like they can now play favourites with Master CBJs, and then distribute them evenly among tables.
Then, in Post 137, George said that Judge 6 is farthest from the norm. This is not necessarily true. It is very likely that your scores are on the order of 36 33 33 33 33 32. The lowest is statistically more significant than the highest....Maybe I've been writing too many standard deviation routines lately....Maybe STD should be taken into account of tie breakers? (I'm really kidding there!)
dmp
Jeff_in_KC
somebody shut me the fark up.
So THAT'S what you needed it for! Had I known that, I would have looked harder! :laugh:
U2CANQUE
is Blowin Smoke!
No, actually had a good cook in Shelby, so, no, didn't need to have a better cook.....but, I did not throw rocks getting out of the parking lot, didn't blame judges, scores, or try to register for another contest to rectify the wrongs that judges did to me....it is not that powerful of a experience in my life......"I took it as "it is what it is"....not hitting the right tables at the right time....no sweats, no worries, and no need to revive judge #6...
Tarheel
Full Fledged Farker
I think anyone who has worked that hard thruout the year and come out on top deserves the spolls that go with it. You cook a single contest and end up with grand you are in the minority there too. TOY is just one more big contest. Yes, there are some things that might could be done to bring more people into the mix. I like the average idea.
I still say get rid of parsly and we need to cook who:becky:le chickens too.
Scottie
Quintessential Chatty Farker
If elected, I will work to outlaw orange <off/road> Crocs.
YankeeBBQ
is Blowin Smoke!
I will support you in that :clap2:
U2CANQUE
is Blowin Smoke!
About time that there was some kind of action proposed by these so called candidates...well, actions that mattered any way
mobow
is one Smokin' Farker
I like the garnish rule as it is also. It makes meat look better. keith
Tarheel
Full Fledged Farker
I know you did, it was just a joke. But you can still blame the judges, I do, unless I know I screwed it up. :doh:
Jeff_in_KC
somebody shut me the fark up.
You mean in addition to the orange croc rule? :becky:
Rookie'48
Quintessential Chatty Farker
If I ever start competing again my new team will be called "Judge Number 6". :thumb:
Plowboy
somebody shut me the fark up.
I have a funny story to tell you about orange crocs next time I see you. Not side splitting, but you'll get a chuckle.
