With Arlie and Ray doing this discussion--it is "way above my pay grade"
But, that never stopped me before
To me, there has to be "something in it" for everyone concerned.
Teams, Organizers, Sponsors, Volunteers, and (most importantly) the Public.
Teams--many of us compete for fun. Nothing wrong with that! But, it can be so expensive that the chance for recovering at least
a part of the costs has to exist for many of us. This requires good purses and reasonable entry fees. That requires the public.
Organizers--Maybe someone does it for fun, but I doubt it. Professional organizers make a part of their living lending their skills to an event. A local Charity is looking for a profit to support their cause or mission.
Without a "profit" of some sort, the sport will dry up. That requires the public.
Sponsors--For the teams and the events, they provide the cash needed to make it all happen! There must be a return for them! Simple. For corporate sponsors, it is simply a matter of "I invest this amount of $$ and I anticipate will receive this $$ return". For Chambers of Commerce and all of that type of sponsor, similar logic--there must be an anticipated $$ return on the investment. Now, there is always the local business that will kick in a hundred bucks cause they "like you" (or you will host a two hundred buck sponsor dinner). That will work also. All of this requires the public.
Volunteers--These wonderful folks make it all happen on event weekend. Maybe, somewhere, there is an event that could function without the league of volunteers, but...? I am sure some of them would work just to be "part of the event". Others are supporting the undelying charity. Whatever happens, I hope these folks are still involved. This requires the public.
The Public--
IMHO--here is the key or critical element in all of this. These folks spend the $$ to make it all worthwhile for all of the folks mentioned above. The buy Que, they pay to park or enter, they buy drinks, they buy trinkets, and they are influenced to buy the sponsors (team and event alike) goods or services.
So, events that can draw large crowds have a better $$ base to tap.
Events near major Metro areas can draw more spectators.
Events with lots of advertizing can draw larger crowds.
Events tagged as "state championships" draw a larger field of "talented or contender" teams, if not spectators.
Events tagged as "Best of..." or "Special" some way draw larger fields of "talented or contender" teams, if not spectators.
Events that can draw major media attention can draw spectators and $$.
Etc, Etc, Etc!
Hope I am not speaking out of line here--but Ray has some excellent thoughts as to why events should be SAT-SUN with awards on SUN to support the public and their interaction with the teams. I will leave it to him to explain if he wishes, but I agree totally.
Just like NASCAR (my favorite "other sport"), all of this growth comes with some pain as you move away from your roots to grow. Not complaining--just observing here.
I think there will always be the "grassroots" events held at the local level. They are just too much fun to go away.
But, more and more corporate sponsorships are happening for teams--mega $$ in many cases.
When all is said and done--it is still "blind" judging. We saw a team at Mobile last year with a $400K rig and "staff" of 10 or so that did not even come close to the Top 15. Ya still gotta be able to cook
That is what makes it fun and competetive while our sport grows.
Thank you--Food Network (and OLN for the few that get it)
TIM