ModelMaker
Quintessential Chatty Farker
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2006
- Messages
- 5,614
- Reaction score
- 8,728
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lake Ponderosa-Montezuma, IA
Why is seating of judges, subject matter for a special closed board meeting?
Ed
Ed
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2006
- Messages
- 12,736
- Reaction score
- 15,624
- Points
- 113
- Location
- At home on the range in Wyoming
I wonder if the new Judge pre-registration program interfaces with the judge scoring history and can assign seating? Maybe there's a bug in the program?
midwest_kc
is one Smokin' Farker
My guess is it is to allow the David and George, who will be developing the system a chance to discuss what is wanted, and what is desired, as well as what they are capable of providing.
Hopefully we get some notes soon.
Hopefully we get some notes soon.
tduffy
is Blowin Smoke!
Because there's a group of people complaining that they ditched the terrible system that seated by a so called "scoring average" and went to random seating.
midwest_kc
is one Smokin' Farker
I would say it's more "No one can come to an agreement on how judges should be seated, and everyone has dug their feet in on their position and is unable to be persuaded another direction, therefore they have to have meetings and decide what the best way forward is, as there is not a consensus on the best way forward. It's not the most efficient use of time, but this is what happens when people quit having a conversation about why their way is better and only points out flaws of other's reasoning"
But, that's just me.
Slamdunkpro
Babbling Farker
Fragile egos.
cpw
Babbling Farker
There was some discussion of details that could potentially compromise the blind.
George offered his opinion and will continue to do so when asked but will not be actively developing anything even if asked!
George offered his opinion and will continue to do so when asked but will not be actively developing anything even if asked!
ModelMaker
Quintessential Chatty Farker
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2006
- Messages
- 5,614
- Reaction score
- 8,728
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lake Ponderosa-Montezuma, IA
Viva El Presidente Jorge!!!!!!
It looks like they talked about how to fix judge seating for 2 1/2 hours and then voted to let the membership vote in a survey how to do it?
Look Ma, no blood on my hands, them guys did it!
Ed
It looks like they talked about how to fix judge seating for 2 1/2 hours and then voted to let the membership vote in a survey how to do it?
Look Ma, no blood on my hands, them guys did it!
Ed
Slamdunkpro
Babbling Farker
Bob in Corona
Full Fledged Farker
Dennis Polson and CBJ Committee... :thumb:
midwest_kc
is one Smokin' Farker
Maybe I'm just rubbernecking, but I'm curious as to what the "Contest incident" is.
Burnt at Both Endz
Babbling Farker
Okay, help me here, I have to be missing something. We are told that KCBS has over 17000 members? This survey looks like only 7700 emails were sent out? https://kcbs.us/news_manager.php?page=17479
Roast Beast
is one Smokin' Farker
Apparently only sent to cooks, judges, and TCs who have participated in the past year.
QN
is one Smokin' Farker
Well, I was a judge or table captain at 5 contests last year and I did not receive the survey, so I don't think that is how they picked who to send it to.
Roast Beast
is one Smokin' Farker
Pappy Q
is Blowin Smoke!
You one of the 18?
