Re: Taxes, but for fun, no "parted pork or judge list" content inside

G$ · Jan 20, 2010

Re: Taxes, but for fun, no "parted pork or judge list" content inside

So I was doing some searches related to taxes and the oft discussed "hobby vs. business" question, and I came across this thread.

Sometimes funny things happen when you look at old threads:

KC_Bobby said:
And being as the Royal is a not-for-profit organization ... I think it's highly likely that they have their ducks in a row when it comes to filing their end of the financial paper work.

Opps, just checked the dates on this thread. Sounds like Great Grills is up to speed on what to do.

Signed, Just wish I was good enough to deal with this issue mod

Carry on.

Scottie · Jan 20, 2010

Those boys are just sandbaggers....

KC_Bobby · Jan 20, 2010

dated 10-10-07 ... that would have been a few days after our first royal where we placed 258 of 496 (with a 411th place pork)

I can honestly say I had forgotten all about that. But I do have information about the subject now. :-D

G$ · Jan 20, 2010

KC_Bobby said:
dated 10-10-07 ... that would have been a few days after our first royal where we placed 258 of 496 (with a 411th place pork)

I can honestly say I had forgotten all about that. But I do have information about the subject now. :-D

Thought you might enjoy it. I was rewatching pitmasters today WHILE reading that thread. I laughed.

Re: Taxes, but for fun, no "parted pork or judge list" content inside

G$

is One Chatty Farker

Scottie

Quintessential Chatty Farker

KC_Bobby

Babbling Farker

G$

is One Chatty Farker

Similar threads