Coldholler
Full Fledged Farker
I've been considering adding a firebox to my propane cooker. Got some good feedback here (http://www.bbq-brethren.com/forum/showthread.php?t=115810).
But I've achieved great success with gas. Part of it's the steady temp I can get. Part of it's the way my homemade cooker works. Its small diameter stacks, good distance between the 1" pipe burner and the cooking surface, and very thick steel angle deflector covering the burner, blocking any direct heat, and sizzling off drippings make for some incredible BBQ. I even get a smoke ring. I've done a 140 pound dressed pig to perfection (17.5 hours at 230ish).
But I love this game, and I'm a believer in the wood smoke testimonials. I've considered adding the firebox as an alternative. I tried using chips, both soaked and not soaked, and my heat's so indirect that they don't get hot enough to ignite them. I'm also leery about combining smoldering wood or coals and gas within the same chamber.
But here's an idea -- why not have a firebox that doesn't screw with the composition of my cooker and that adds smoke during just the critical first hour or two, for flavor? I understand the first ascent to temp is the only time smoke gets really absorbed, anyway. Then go to gas for the heat control and ease it provides over many hours? I'm thinking of cutting a round hole in one end of the smoker and running a flue through it from the stack of a small, portable smoker grill. Then, I could burn coals and wood of my choice, kissing the meat with smoke.
I'll eventually get a second BBQ trailer with an offset firebox and plates creating a reverse flow. Like I said, I'm hooked. But meanwhile, this sounds like a fun and possibly unique project that could yield some tasty BBQ. Any thoughts? Here are some pictures of my cooker...
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ChykDi9TDsg/TlJ8v6A8pUI/AAAAAAAAA00/A3YPSr6whPA/s1600/IMG_4309.JPG
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sPi_MXwJ_m4/Tkks0RzZLKI/AAAAAAAAAzM/62stC1xYYTg/s1600/IMG_3842.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--bEiGecKPDE/TkksrofapLI/AAAAAAAAAy0/X5gF8lqDfQo/s1600/IMG_3944.JPG
But I've achieved great success with gas. Part of it's the steady temp I can get. Part of it's the way my homemade cooker works. Its small diameter stacks, good distance between the 1" pipe burner and the cooking surface, and very thick steel angle deflector covering the burner, blocking any direct heat, and sizzling off drippings make for some incredible BBQ. I even get a smoke ring. I've done a 140 pound dressed pig to perfection (17.5 hours at 230ish).
But I love this game, and I'm a believer in the wood smoke testimonials. I've considered adding the firebox as an alternative. I tried using chips, both soaked and not soaked, and my heat's so indirect that they don't get hot enough to ignite them. I'm also leery about combining smoldering wood or coals and gas within the same chamber.
But here's an idea -- why not have a firebox that doesn't screw with the composition of my cooker and that adds smoke during just the critical first hour or two, for flavor? I understand the first ascent to temp is the only time smoke gets really absorbed, anyway. Then go to gas for the heat control and ease it provides over many hours? I'm thinking of cutting a round hole in one end of the smoker and running a flue through it from the stack of a small, portable smoker grill. Then, I could burn coals and wood of my choice, kissing the meat with smoke.
I'll eventually get a second BBQ trailer with an offset firebox and plates creating a reverse flow. Like I said, I'm hooked. But meanwhile, this sounds like a fun and possibly unique project that could yield some tasty BBQ. Any thoughts? Here are some pictures of my cooker...
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ChykDi9TDsg/TlJ8v6A8pUI/AAAAAAAAA00/A3YPSr6whPA/s1600/IMG_4309.JPG
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sPi_MXwJ_m4/Tkks0RzZLKI/AAAAAAAAAzM/62stC1xYYTg/s1600/IMG_3842.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--bEiGecKPDE/TkksrofapLI/AAAAAAAAAy0/X5gF8lqDfQo/s1600/IMG_3944.JPG