Testing Timberline 1300 - MAK 2 Star General - Ongoing

tom b

somebody shut me the fark up.
Joined
Oct 12, 2015
Messages
7,808
Reaction score
1...
Points
113
Location
Temecula...
I have been pellet cooking for 5-6 years we are on our second Traeger, I have only cooked with them, that is mostly what you see here. I recently picked up a Mak and would like to choose between the 2 and move one along. I needed to see what the differences between what I have and what is been raved about.

Please excuse all the babbling, I doing this to log my thoughts to help make a decision. Hopefully it may help somebodies a little easier or at least more informed

Test #1 a quick cook chicken thighs:
Weather cloudy and 64, no wind

I dry brined these with k-salt for 5-6 hrs then applied some garlic herb spice and some lemon pepper
tIviaDnh.jpg


I set both cookers to 375 the Mak was to temp in 17 min :-D and the timberline 48, my biggest gripe since owning this cooker

as far as visible smoke the timberline shows a bit occasionally and the mak ran 50/50 blue waves and light smoke, hard to see in pics but here they are

timberline
IAdzr8Uh.jpg


MAK
SweFp1Jh.jpg


this is where I place the pcs on the cookers to see about zone differential

timberline
Dc7UXrlh.jpg


MAK
XqNstnfh.jpg


after 30 min I took a look, all pcs temp in the 155-162 range

timberline
P4w0kgnh.jpg


MAK
R09rZ2hh.jpg


I decided to let them go 15 more minutes, this what the looked like when I took them off al temping 188+
jRysz4Nh.jpg


Bite shot, timberline on the left, MAK the right. Both had crispy skin but the tiberline bit through a little cleaner
gZ3577Mh.jpg


Conclusion:
food quality and smoke profile had no noticeable difference.

Edge goes to the MAK for quicker start up time.
 
Wow, that is not what I expected. Nice job on the comparison. Looking forward to a longer cook.
 
I absolutely love this kind of stuff! Keep it coming Tom :)
 
The MAK is overhyped trash, sell it! :heh:
 
Last edited:
I find that often times, especially on poultry, the flavor profile is more pronounced the next day. I wouldn’t expect any pellet grill to be WAY different than the next when cooking at 375°... but you and your wife taking turns doing a blind taste test tomorrow would be interesting.
 
17 minutes to get to 375 not bad, getting ready todo a charcoal grill vs pellet grill test to see which is the quickest to get up to grilling temps for steaks (500+). I'm pretty sure I already know which will win but it will be neat to document it.
 
17 minutes to get to 375 not bad, getting ready todo a charcoal grill vs pellet grill test to see which is quickest to get up to grilling temps for steaks (500+). I'm pretty sure I already know which will win but it will be neat to document it.



Lump or briquettes for the test? If lump, my $ is on the kettle.
 
17 minutes to get to 375 not bad, getting ready todo a charcoal grill vs pellet grill test to see which is the quickest to get up to grilling temps for steaks (500+). I'm pretty sure I already know which will win but it will be neat to document it.

I've never timed it, but I think it will be closer than you think.
 
I find that often times, especially on poultry, the flavor profile is more pronounced the next day. I wouldn’t expect any pellet grill to be WAY different than the next when cooking at 375°... but you and your wife taking turns doing a blind taste test tomorrow would be interesting.
I agree. At 375 probably not much difference. Looking forward to more testing...

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 
thats a long warm up time on the treager. it would be a deal breaker......the whole point of pellets is convenience
 
Size??

Not trying to throw gas on the fire here. Isn't there a pretty big size difference between these 2 grills? The MAK is smaller & should warm up faster right???
 
Not trying to throw gas on the fire here. Isn't there a pretty big size difference between these 2 grills? The MAK is smaller & should warm up faster right???



Absolutely! That said, the Traeger Timberlines are “insulated” much more so than the MAK’s, so you’d expect (or at least I would) to see a shorter preheat time than 40+ minutes. That kind of caught me off guard. Regarding the MAK’s... I have owned 3 now (at different times). My first was a 2011 MAK 1 Star. It definitely took longer to preheat and recover when opened than my 2017 and now 2019 2 Star. When MAK released their Funnel Flame Zone in 2017 that was a game changer for them. By design, all heat is forced into the cooking chamber vs sitting around in the belly of the cooker before rising. There was a very noticeable difference when I started cooking on a MAK w/ FFZ.
 
My 1300 only takes about 25 minutes to get to 350°. I start mine at 225° and when it reaches that temp, I will increase it to whatever temp I am planning to cook. I did some Hamburger steaks the other day and it only took 35 minutes to get to 500°.
 
Back
Top