A Rib Poll

Do you turn in baby backs or spares?

  • baby backs

    Votes: 23 40.4%
  • spares

    Votes: 34 59.6%

  • Total voters
    57
  • Poll closed .

Solidkick

somebody shut me the fark up.
Joined
Oct 21, 2003
Messages
6,769
Reaction score
87
Points
0
Location
Bandera Owner in Missouri
Another brother and myself was having a conversation today about ribs...what we prefer verses what we think the judges would prefer.

Though we both decided we like baby backs as our personal preference to eat, we were wondering if that is what people are turning in for a competition, or are they turning in spares and if there is a decisive advantage to do so.

So...do you turn in Baby backs or Spares?

Poll is set up to NOT show who voted how, only your answer.
 
I think (may be wrong) that we have been through this before.

We do not prefer one over the other and do not see many judges who do.
May be a regional thing.

We try to find the best "quality" ribs and cook them the best we can.
We have been having trouble lately finding real quality ribs of either type :twisted:

We llok for "meaty" ribs with bones that are kinda aligned up perpendicular to the rack/slab.
Also, we like some meat between the bones so we can slice them evenly.

Hard to find, of either persuasion :oops:

For us--either work--just gotta be quality going in!

TIM
 
Gary,

I will eat ribs any style. During competition though my team has elected to cook full spares St. Louis style. We feel that after all the cutting and cleaning a St. Louis style full spare looks more pleasing to a judge. Our thinking could be wrong but this is how we do it.
 
We asked this question of the two CBS aster Judges that cooked with us this weekend. They felt like it was 50/50 on what gets turned in. They also felt like judges don't prefer one over the other and score the rib on its own merit. That's there perception based on their 30+ contests. Wonder what some of the reps here like Arlie or Merl have heard from judges and table captains.
 
Down this way we have to turn in spares. I'm glad too, BB's are so much more expensive.
TGCBCA, IBCA, Lone Star....
 
I tend to do spares also because of the cost and they seem to have more meat on them which should help appearance. I know I don't like to go out to eat and get a bunch of skinny ribs. When you can get three slabs in one pack for the cost of one slab of baby backs it makes a difference when you have no sponsors and a tight budget.
 
We just cooked six (I think) slabs of spares today and i'm tellin ya, the slabs, when done, looked thin and dry. And we didn't evercook either. We tore into one and I believe babybacks have more flavor. I just wasn't impressed. Of course, I've only cooked maybe 20 slabs of spares ever.
 
I prefer babybacks to eat. I have always turned in babybacks until this weekend. I ordered 3 racks of St. Louis cut spares. I do like the shape of the St Louis ribs and the whole rack is the same size for the most part as opposed to the smaller ribs on the ends of babys. I cooked 3 racks of babys & 3 of St. Louis cut spares. Same rub, same cook time. One slab of babys was overcooked due to bad placement on the cooker, one broke in two due to a handeling mistake and the other had some appearance issue. so I went with the St. Louis ribs. The result is was the lowest scores I have ever gotten in ribs. In appearance I got 7-9-8-8-8-8. In taste i got 7-7-7-6-8-8. In tenderness i got 8-6-7-5-8-9. I have never gotten low scores in tenderness with babys. I am gonna try some different techniques before the next contest (3 weeks). While I want to go with the spares my results point to babys.
 
We do baby backs or loin back ribs Whatevery you want to call them. I myself have no luck with spars, st louie cut. maybe I just suck at them. But the baby backs I do pretty well.
 
My biggest problem with baby backs is cutting them. I always screw up 3-4 cuts by hitting bone.
 
I use cut spares. I like the more meat and ability to ad flavor to them.
 
I like both types of ribs but I also find that spares cut cleaner for me. BBs are good though and my teamates prefer them so I usually give in. In a perfect world I cook both and turn in the best out of the 2.
 
I have only done one comp and used BB's so I did not vote up above. They took 20th out of 60. The next week I did up some St. Louis trimmed spares at the house and I believe they were much better than the ones I turned in. So next time, I will do spares.
 
Someone will probably ask this question year after year, and I think we'll see cooking trends change....with spares at 2.25 a lb vs babybacks at 3.48 a lb, that's enough to make you consider switching right there....but so far I've still got the feeling of "you got to dance with the one that brought ya"........until I get into a conversation with a judge that says "I don't like babybacks"....then it's "to the moon Alice"
 
I usually cook 3 slabs of both for a contest, but have found that I usually end up turning in spares.
They have more meat, you can cut them to present as six ribs of the same shape and size, and they are more forgiving on cook time.
From an eating stand point, I like them both.
 
When I cut my ribs I turn them upside down so I see where the bones are. Before that I was hitting quite a few bones.

I'm worried it will put flat spots on them. i turn em upside down at home when I cook, or set em on the ends and cut down, but at comps I hit from the top side and pray i dont hit bone.

gonna practice my gentle technique for bottom cutting.
 
Back
Top