A food scientist's 4 tips for barbecue success

Ron_L

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Messages
42,758
Reaction score
35,621
Points
113
Location
Wandering, but not lost
I saw this posted on Facebook.

Interesting article...

http://www.vox.com/2014/6/1/5765070/a-food-scientists-4-tips-for-barbecue-success

When it comes to barbecuing, there are all sorts of expert tips out there that people claim to be the secret to delicious, succulent meat.

Some of these tips are correct, but have to be followed in a particular way to be effective. Others are entirely wrong.

Science to the rescue. Recently, food scientist Guy Crosby looked at the chemistry of barbecue — and explained how you can use scientific knowledge to maximize your barbecue success. Here are a few of his tips.
 
I thought I read alot of information claiming that marinades should be very low sodium, not high sodium? Only saying that because I did a ton of reading about marinades when preparing for a contest that had Tri tip as a category.
 
I love food science.
Tip 4 will ruin a steak, and should have been explained more expansively.
 
Didn't read it yet but i will. H&F doesn't dry meat out though..lol Somebody should tell that too my chicken when i cook it about 500* :rolleyes:

I think H&F should be re defined to over 350*
 
The high in sodium recommendation is something that doesn't apply to me because I don't want my rub or marinade to completely take over the taste of my meat. I like the taste of the meat I'm cooking. The seasoning or marinade is just a complement for it.
 
There is, however, a trade-off in terms of temperature: the meat will lose the least amount of moisture at the low end of this range, but at the higher end, collagen (a tough type of connective tissue) gets converted to gelatin, making it much more tender. Completely converting collagen into gelatin is how you get types of barbecue that can be easily ripped apart — like pulled pork.

275-300 perfect imo for most meats.
 
There is, however, a trade-off in terms of temperature: the meat will lose the least amount of moisture at the low end of this range, but at the higher end, collagen (a tough type of connective tissue) gets converted to gelatin, making it much more tender. Completely converting collagen into gelatin is how you get types of barbecue that can be easily ripped apart — like pulled pork.

275-300 perfect imo for most meats.

I agree. Though my magic numbers are 250-275, those temps are great as well.
 
Moisture loss is directly proportional to the final temperature of the product. If you cook super hot, the outside areas of the product will get to a higher temperature before the center gets to the temperature you want. Those outside areas that get to a higher temperature than the core will tend to dry out.

However, in barbecue, you are usually cooking your meats to a much higher internal temperature than a steak. Evaporative cooling actually slows the temperature of the outside while the core is coming up to temp. You simply can't get the internal temperature of the meat above the "stall" until enough moisture has evaporated unless you wrap. So, it really doesn't matter what temp you are cooking your barbecue at (within reason), because it has to get rid of the same amount of moisture before it can beat the evaporative cooling. Of course, if you wrap, you are avoiding the stall. However, the temp inside the wrap is never going to rise much above the boiling point of water; so you're cook temperature doesn't matter that much.

So to make a long story short. Hot and fast vs low and slow doesn't make much difference in meats where the target temperature is above about 175. As long as it spends enough time in the zone to render most of the collagen into gelatin, you'll be fine.
 
Moisture loss is directly proportional to the final temperature of the product. If you cook super hot, the outside areas of the product will get to a higher temperature before the center gets to the temperature you want. Those outside areas that get to a higher temperature than the core will tend to dry out.

However, in barbecue, you are usually cooking your meats to a much higher internal temperature than a steak. Evaporative cooling actually slows the temperature of the outside while the core is coming up to temp. You simply can't get the internal temperature of the meat above the "stall" until enough moisture has evaporated unless you wrap. So, it really doesn't matter what temp you are cooking your barbecue at (within reason), because it has to get rid of the same amount of moisture before it can beat the evaporative cooling. Of course, if you wrap, you are avoiding the stall. However, the temp inside the wrap is never going to rise much above the boiling point of water; so you're cook temperature doesn't matter that much.

So to make a long story short. Hot and fast vs low and slow doesn't make much difference in meats where the target temperature is above about 175. As long as it spends enough time in the zone to render most of the collagen into gelatin, you'll be fine.

I feel sorry for you, but appreciate your honesty and bravery!
:clap2:

Beliefs win over evidence.
 
I love food science.
Tip 4 will ruin a steak, and should have been explained more expansively.

Would you care to expand on this topic? So as to avoid the rest of us gullible bastidges from ruining our meats.
 
I love food science.
Tip 4 will ruin a steak, and should have been explained more expansively.
Would you care to expand on this topic? So as to avoid the rest of us gullible bastidges from ruining our meats.
I thank you. It should have read rule 3.
That would ruin a low collagen meat.
 
Regardless of my opinions about this article, the title is rather misleading, as nearly as much content is devoted to grilling as it is to BBQ. Two VERY different things.
 
Item #4 (that meat needs to be rested) is a matter of controversy, and Meathead at Amazing Ribs disagrees:

http://amazingribs.com/tips_and_technique/mythbusting_resting_meat.html

...I'm not sure what I think. But in any case, it's ridiculous to reccomend one amount of time (10 minutes) for any sized hunk of meat. It's just faintly ironic that the article reccomends Amazing Ribs as a source of info right under item #4.

...It should be noted that Meathead reccomends (in a side box) cooler resting for a different reason:

"Yes, I know that pork butts and beef briskets are often rested for an hour or so in an insulated box like a faux cambro after smoking, but that is for a different reason. That is to deliberately allow very gentle slow carryover cooking to continue to tenderize the meat."
 
Item #4 (that meat needs to be rested) is a matter of controversy, and Meathead at Amazing Ribs disagrees:

http://amazingribs.com/tips_and_technique/mythbusting_resting_meat.html

...I'm not sure what I think. But in any case, it's ridiculous to reccomend one amount of time (10 minutes) for any sized hunk of meat. It's just faintly ironic that the article reccomends Amazing Ribs as a source of info right under item #4....

Apparently there is more than one reason he is called Meathead:biggrin1:.
I checked the link and it looks to me that his "evidence" has been tampered with, the plate on the left appears to me to have been wiped with something.
IMHO cooking temp is less important than leaving the meat on the grate too long, over cooking will give you dry meat every time.
 
Back
Top