• working on DNS.. links may break temporarily.

Bark or No Bark

Billy Ribs

Knows what a fatty is.
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
62
Reaction score
14
Points
0
Location
Allen TX
I just picked up five 20-25# bags of wood. 1 each of Apple, Apricot, Nectarine, Pecan, and Plum.

My question is: Do I need to remove the bark before burning it?

I have read (on this fine forum) that you should remove the heavier bark such as Mesquite, oak, etc. but I'm not sure about the lighter barks.
*
*
*
 
I guess if you're a purist or worried of off flavors, remove the bark. Me, I never worry about it.
 
Every bbq joint's pile I see around her looks just like a load of firewood. So I would say no, it's not necessary.
 
I really appreciate the feed back.

I guess its like most things with BBQ, personal taste. I think I'll try it both ways and see it I can tell the difference.
*
*
*
 
throw some with no bark on the fire. than later try a little with bark in the fire see .... no differance :doh:
 
I never bother with removing the bark from any of the apple, cherry, and maple I get from the trees on the property.
 
Experiment and see what you like. However, Tuffy Stone won Grand Champion at a contest this past weekend against 58 other teams. His wood pile had oak and hickory piled up with bark and all.
 
I been a stick burner for a long time . I always leave the bark on unless it falls off.
 
I don't think it matters for bigger smokers,, smaller smokers---maybe! I don't even think about it anymore:confused:
 
I'm a bark on person also. Tried both ways on several different cooks and couldn't find a distinct difference.
 
Back
Top