Boshizzle
somebody shut me the fark up.
Both slabs rubbed with Yardbird, black pepper, and cumin. Cooked at about 250 degrees using regular K and hickory in my UDS.
The top slab in the pic was foiled with some honey, garlic, butter, and brown sugar. I mopped the "no foil" ribs with a mixture of vinegar and olive oil about three times during the cook. Normally, I'd use Italian dressing but I didn't have any on hand. I didn't turn them at all, just "meat" side up. The foiled ribs were cooked "meat" side down while in the foil.
The bottom slab was cooked without foiling.
The ribs on the right were foiled, the ribs in the left were not.
The foiled ribs cooked a little faster and had a nice glaze. The ribs that were not foiled took a little longer to cook, maybe 1/2 an hour longer.
Both were tender but not falling off the bone; they were "bite off" the bone.
Both slabs were really good but, flavor wise, I prefer the ribs that were not foiled. The flavor of the ribs was intensified and they didn't have the sweet glaze on them. But, if you like them sweet and a little wet, go for the foil and use some honey/brown sugar with whatever liquid you decide to use.
My conclusion, if you want to speed up the cook a little, foil them. Also, foiling allows you to put the nice shine on the ribs. Other than that, if you are going for the natural flavor of the ribs, you don't need foil. The foil helps with the glaze and speeds up the cook, that's about it.
The top slab in the pic was foiled with some honey, garlic, butter, and brown sugar. I mopped the "no foil" ribs with a mixture of vinegar and olive oil about three times during the cook. Normally, I'd use Italian dressing but I didn't have any on hand. I didn't turn them at all, just "meat" side up. The foiled ribs were cooked "meat" side down while in the foil.
The bottom slab was cooked without foiling.
The ribs on the right were foiled, the ribs in the left were not.
The foiled ribs cooked a little faster and had a nice glaze. The ribs that were not foiled took a little longer to cook, maybe 1/2 an hour longer.
Both were tender but not falling off the bone; they were "bite off" the bone.
Both slabs were really good but, flavor wise, I prefer the ribs that were not foiled. The flavor of the ribs was intensified and they didn't have the sweet glaze on them. But, if you like them sweet and a little wet, go for the foil and use some honey/brown sugar with whatever liquid you decide to use.
My conclusion, if you want to speed up the cook a little, foil them. Also, foiling allows you to put the nice shine on the ribs. Other than that, if you are going for the natural flavor of the ribs, you don't need foil. The foil helps with the glaze and speeds up the cook, that's about it.
Last edited: