• working on DNS.. links may break temporarily.

Picnic Shoulder vs Boston Butt

MeatyOakerSmoker

is Blowin Smoke!
Joined
Nov 15, 2010
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
297
Points
0
Location
NJ
Hello

I've always used "pork shoulder" aka "pork butt", "Boston butt", or whatever the heck you want to call it, for making my pulled pork. It's the only should cut I've really ever used mainly because I'm not even sure how people cook picnic shoulder.

I got the anatomy thing down but I was wondering what people's cooking experiences are with the two and what they use for what recipes.

Hopefully this isn't against the forum bylaws but this link might help kickoff the discussion:
http://www.virtualweberbullet.com/porkbuttselect.html

Thanks
Sam
 
Welcome. Simply, cook them exactly the same. Picnics will render a little less meat by weight than a butt. They're both part of the "whole shoulder"; I tend to cook them still attached. Same / same.
 
Welcome. Simply, cook them exactly the same. Picnics will render a little less meat by weight than a butt. They're both part of the "whole shoulder"; I tend to cook them still attached. Same / same.

Right on.

At home, I like to cook picnics rather than butts.

Could be my imagination, but the picnic seems a bit "sweeter" and has a different texture than the butt portion.
Not better, just different and a nice change up from all the comp butts we cook.

TIM
 
I would agree that the shoulder and the picnic will both yield great pulled pork. I have used both, and done them both exactly the same way, and ended up with pork that I can't tell apart.

The only difference that I know of is the picnic, will ussually yeild slightly less meat, since there is more bone, and usually some skin. The good part, is if done right the skin is farking great, just great strips of greasy, fatty, flavorfull goodness.:-D

John
 
I have used them both and don't trim either. Both work just fine for pulled pork.
 
Right on.

At home, I like to cook picnics rather than butts.

Could be my imagination, but the picnic seems a bit "sweeter" and has a different texture than the butt portion.
Not better, just different and a nice change up from all the comp butts we cook.

TIM

It definitely has a slightly different texture to most of the meat, and it does have (perhaps just my imagination) a slightly different taste, perhaps it's sweeter...

I prefer the butts, but that's nothing against the picnic portions... It's ALL good!!!
 
I don't cook them very often , but the flavor is good and they look pretty
 
A buddy brought over a picnic (upper portion, no skin) for a New Year's Eve party last night and I swear it had more flavor than a butt. It also seemed to have a slightly different texture than pulled pork from a butt: it was a little bit more greasy, but that wasn't a bad thing... When comparing butts and picnics, generally speaking, is one more expensive than the other?
 
I buy and cook what is on sale.

I prefer picnics. There is more meat/bone ratio which equals sweeter meat.
 
At least around me butts are more expense. I always see picnics on sale but never shoulders. I've never cooked a picnic but I think I'm going to try.
 
At least around me butts are more expense. I always see picnics on sale but never shoulders. I've never cooked a picnic but I think I'm going to try.

Do it. You won't be disappointed.

Let us know how it turns out. :thumb:
 
I prefer the sweeter meat on a shoulder/picnic rather than a butt. However, when cooking for the masses, I use the butt for the higher yields of edible meat.
 
pork_cuts.jpg
 
One of my best picnics ever!

Trimmed and rubbed:

Picnic0021.jpg


Off the ECB Gourmet:

Picnic0022.jpg


Pulled:

Picnic0023.jpg


That was some awesome tasting PP.
 
In the practical world they are interchangeable. If one seems sweeter it's not the cut it's just a different hog.
 
I agree that picnics are "sweeter". Just did one this weekend that was one of the best we have done in a long time...
I used to take the skin off, but leave it on now and cook it skin down on the Egg....
 
Back
Top