Divemaster
somebody shut me the fark up.
While I agree with the following to some extent...
I think we are missing one very important point. Just how much charcoal is actually burning at any point in time? On my UDS, I've gotten as much as an 18 hour burn on roughly 8 - 10 pounds of lump. To me, that's saying that there cannot be all that much burning at any point and the heat is going to be disapated rather quickly throughout the cooker, unlike a grill where you go through 4 or 5 pounds in the span of say an hour.
To tell the truth, I've been known to go through 40 pounds of lump and a dozen logs on my Lang in 12 hours. Yes, it's a larger cooker and in order to keep the temps up in the cooking chamber, I need to have a good amount of heat in the fire box. Something we just don't need in a UDS.
I think at that low of a temp the distance from the direct source may play a role as to cooking faster than drying out a piece of meat.
Distance from the fire or offsetting from the fire eases the radiant effect and then the created environment takes over. JMHO
I think we are missing one very important point. Just how much charcoal is actually burning at any point in time? On my UDS, I've gotten as much as an 18 hour burn on roughly 8 - 10 pounds of lump. To me, that's saying that there cannot be all that much burning at any point and the heat is going to be disapated rather quickly throughout the cooker, unlike a grill where you go through 4 or 5 pounds in the span of say an hour.
To tell the truth, I've been known to go through 40 pounds of lump and a dozen logs on my Lang in 12 hours. Yes, it's a larger cooker and in order to keep the temps up in the cooking chamber, I need to have a good amount of heat in the fire box. Something we just don't need in a UDS.