Originally Posted by boogiesnap
i only saw the new score sheet for couple minutes(it wasn't mine).
after all that work, would it be possible to narrow down what was going on at table four by judge?
like say, one or two individuals were actually bringing the whole table down?
i'd find it hard to beleive all six judges at a table were lowballers.
i'd also find it hard to beleive all six entries for all four categories were subpar that hit table 4.
Since we are able to see the Judge Average Score for the entire contest, another thing that the new score sheet shows is that every judge at Table 4 in Holbrook had a contest average of 29.1912 or lower. Of the remaining three tables that I can see, (Tables 1, 2 & 5. We did not hit Table 3 so I have no data for their average scores on my sheet.), only 1 of those 18 judges had an average score below 30.0000 and 10 of those 18 had averages of 32.000 or higher. The actual average scores for the judges at Table 4 were as follows:
Judge 1 - 29.0094
Judge 2 - 28.7486
Judge 3 - 28.5371
Judge 4 - 26.2769
Judge 5 - 26.8790
Judge 6 - 29.1912
Their combined average for the contest was 28.1070
The combined average for the other tables I can see are:
Table 1 - 32.4984
Table 2 - 31.0785
Table 5 - 31.9779
That's a huge difference.