I may have missed this earlier in the thread, as I have not read the whole thing. It seems to me that what they are doing could be achieved by making sure there is a short commit on every score. Might even come up with a coding system that would expedite the scoring, as in the number 1 means to salty. With this system you would know why a judge scored you the way they did.
I was at a contest that another sanctioning body put on where most judges commented and I found I agreed with some of the judges and some of the judges contidicted other judges. This way you could look at the comment and decide for yourself if the judge was on point or not.
I think there is always going to be luck in this as we are facing human judges and thank god that is the case or the same teams would always win and what would be the point of showing up if you are not one of the winning teams.