View Single Post
Unread 09-06-2012, 02:23 PM   #35
olewarthog
Full Fledged Farker
 
olewarthog's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-10
Location: Hazlehurst, GA
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorge View Post
That can be accomplished by sending boxes to different tables, and retaining the opportunity for each team to land on good/bad tables.

I want each team to have the same opportunity to land on the SAME table. Otherwise you just penalized the six teams that landed on a 'bad" table for chicken if you change the makeup for ribs. If you are randomly moving people from table to table there doesn't appear to be any safeguard to prevent the formation of another bad table, which one or more teams from the first category may land on again further hurting their chances. The converse is also true. You may create a judging pool where one or more teams gain an advantage in the event they land on more than one high scoring table.
But shouldn't the objective be NOT to have "good" & "bad" tables? Assigned seating means that a "good" or "bad" table remains as such throughout the contest. Random seating means that the same 5 or 6 "good" judges and the same 5 or 6 "bad" judges do not determine the winners & losers.
__________________
Jim Sewell -- GBA Vice President, Master Judge, Contest Rep & GBA Webmaster
olewarthog is offline   Reply With Quote


Thanks from:--->