The BBQ BRETHREN FORUMS.

The BBQ BRETHREN FORUMS. (https://www.bbq-brethren.com/forum/index.php)
-   Q-talk (https://www.bbq-brethren.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Brisket: Does This Make Sense? (https://www.bbq-brethren.com/forum/showthread.php?t=60457)

Greg60525 04-21-2009 12:12 AM

Brisket: Does This Make Sense?
 
I cut a 6.7 lb brisket flat in half to do an injection/rub comparison. So, if your going by time per pound I figured about 4 - 5 hours. I foiled the brisket with some of the leftover injection at ~ 170°F and cooked for about another hour ending with the temp at 206°F. The pit temp was 250°F. The main goal was a flavor comparison. When I was done I was able to make my judgement on taste, but the tenderness, although good for sandwiches, was not competition quality tender. I was pressed for time and wasn't overly concerned about it, but I want to check my understanding of what has occurred.

So, here's my understanding.........please correct, comment, etc..

Although a smaller brisket will come up to temperature quicker than a larger one, that is not the whole story. It is a time/temperature relationship because it's the connective tissue that has to break down to make the brisket tender. The internal temp of 206°F is quite a bit higher than I take the 10 pounders, but it reached it so much quicker, which makes sense due to its small size. To me it would seem that it would take the connective tissue the same amount of time to break down in a small brisket as it does in a large brisket and the only difference in the total cook time is the time it takes the internal temp to get to a predifined temp. The larger one taking longer.

I think this makes sense. What do you think?

Thanks,

Pyle's BBQ 04-21-2009 12:21 AM

How did the brisket feel when you took the temp? Did it feel done? Many here use temp as a gauge to see when to check for doneness and the use the feel of the brisket to know if it is done.

I believe that you are right in your assessment. The connective tissue will still need the same amount of time to break down at that temp. If you had increased the temp, then the connective tissue would have broke down faster. Do a search for high temp brisket for more info.

Bbq Bubba 04-21-2009 07:31 AM

Did you slice it properly?

thirdeye 04-21-2009 08:20 AM

I've never gotten the same quality when I cook smaller flats (less than 5#) like I do from larger ones. In theory, the temperature over time effect on the breakdown and collagen to gelatin conversion should be the same on either size, but for me it's not.

Greg60525 04-21-2009 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyle's BBQ (Post 907325)
How did the brisket feel when you took the temp? Did it feel done?

The probe didn't go in as easy as it normally does, but I was pressed for time. I usually hold in a heated cooler for several hours, but this time it was only held fro 1 hour. A few things were stacked against me.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bbq Bubba (Post 907424)
Did you slice it properly?

I marked it first, parallel to the grain and then cut perpindicular to the cut mark.Thanks guys. Just trying to check my understanding. Some experiments in the future to confirm it may be in order.

michiana mark 04-22-2009 12:45 AM

My opinion on brisket may vary from some others, but it's mine and I stick with it. I have never liked brisket that I have cooked hot, over 230 pit temp, and I don't like it cooked direct. Smaller flats need time to break down collagen as do larger packers. But if you cook thinner cuts of meat at the same temp as larger ones, the thinner ones will almost always come to temp before the thicker ones. This doesn't mean that you will have given that small flat enough time to breakdown and tenderize. Always use the feel test. When I cook a small flat, I try to keep the pit at 200, it may sound low, but this should help get your brisket in the right area.. No need to rush a brisket along, let him hang out in the smoke as long as he needs to.

barbefunkoramaque 04-22-2009 08:38 AM

Attachment 26420

ELEMENTALLY

The very little fat that you did have, left the brisket, without binding to the collagen molecules.

I know nothing about your cut to start with or your smoker so fat up or fat down for how long I can't say.


HOW THEORIZED (Only My Opinion)

If you ever notice on a .... choosing word carefully... "traditionally" cooked brisket packer, it comes out more tender and is more forgiving. This is due to its mass and amount of fat it has. It also a packer, due to its mass and fat, takes higher temperatures for a period (only the end of the cook after the stall is the leastforgiving). Flats will climb quicker for this reason and therefore you nearly have to follow all the rules (even the typical low and slow under 230 rule) or have to foil it to get it to come close to a packer. Flats are very tempermental this way. I hate it when one of my suppliers (who owns a grocery store) donates flats or prices them at a nutty price I cannot resist for a few reasons. One it is harder to tell more about the cow it came from. Its trimmed, its harder to find if its a lefty or righty, and sometimes its maybe a 6-7 pound FLAT that was trimmed to 4 lbs to match the others (using the cut offs for hamburger). So you just don't know. You can even often cook those puppies perfect and still have 6 or 7 come our tough right next to 40 or 50 that came out tender.

Attachment 26421

Also that Fat/collagen bond i was talking about happens easier in a flat when its covered by foil not so much for the steaming as from what I can tell sitting in its juices (which essentially is a bath of fat that will bond with those collagen molecules and let them let go of the meat fibers) How do I know this?????????????????????????????????????????????
I don't foil anything (cept in emergencies) because it is messy when doing 30-40 packers or 50-60 briskets. I PAN which is almost the same BUT I don't cover and flats (in the rare back against the wall case i do this) it still comes out tender and with better bark. The tough ones I will transfer into one or two pans and cover (steel cover) and steam for a few.

Remember, this is only my Opinion about why... listen to everyone and put some thought into it.

barbefunkoramaque 04-22-2009 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michiana mark (Post 908193)
No need to rush a brisket along, let him hang out in the smoke as long as he needs to.


Okay I have had it! This is a travesty. Although your observations about brisket are intelligent there is NO excuse for using the Male gender when attaching pronouns to your culinary prose.

Briskets are women.... they are done when they are done, none of them ever coming from poking them to doneness at the same time. Please refrain from calling a Brisket a He... you will confuse it.


In case no one can tell...I am joking.

But it is HOW you chose to sexualize your brisket that matters.

A Male "He" brisket
Attachment 26422

A Female Brisket
Attachment 26423

:shock:

Bigmista 04-22-2009 09:06 AM

Ummmm..right.

Anyway, did you let the flats restat all before slicing? There was no mention of that.

MTHank 04-22-2009 09:31 AM

I'll have to go with your "Female Brisket" theory :biggrin: Does this mean this thread is headed for the woodpile? :shock:

Meat Burner 04-22-2009 05:40 PM

I love female brisket !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DaChief 04-22-2009 06:45 PM

Thread hijack alert........but ........female brisket = YUMMY!!

Greg60525 04-22-2009 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigmista (Post 908300)
Anyway, did you let the flats restat all before slicing? There was no mention of that.

I did let them rest for about 15 minutes before slicing.

There is a lot of good information........err, opinions! I appreciate it. Just looking for ideas that I could use to draw my own conclusions or to be able to better set-up an experiment.

This is just what I was looking for.

Oh.......one more piece of information. I get the smoker good and hot and as the pit temp starts dropping below 300 - 275°F I throw on the briskets and let the temp settle in at 250°F, which I try to maintain. This has been my general procedure for any brisket. I never cooked one this small before, but I didn't change the procedure. I'm still fairly new at this, so I'm looking for any helpful hints, procedures, etc..

Thanks,

ElJefe 04-16-2012 01:20 PM

You might consider...
 
You might consider cooking the smaller briskets at a lower temp (say 200) for a longer period of time. That way, the connective tissue would still have time to break down without burning up or drying out the brisket. Just a thought.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg60525 (Post 907323)
I cut a 6.7 lb brisket flat in half to do an injection/rub comparison. So, if your going by time per pound I figured about 4 - 5 hours. I foiled the brisket with some of the leftover injection at ~ 170°F and cooked for about another hour ending with the temp at 206°F. The pit temp was 250°F. The main goal was a flavor comparison. When I was done I was able to make my judgement on taste, but the tenderness, although good for sandwiches, was not competition quality tender. I was pressed for time and wasn't overly concerned about it, but I want to check my understanding of what has occurred.

So, here's my understanding.........please correct, comment, etc..

Although a smaller brisket will come up to temperature quicker than a larger one, that is not the whole story. It is a time/temperature relationship because it's the connective tissue that has to break down to make the brisket tender. The internal temp of 206°F is quite a bit higher than I take the 10 pounders, but it reached it so much quicker, which makes sense due to its small size. To me it would seem that it would take the connective tissue the same amount of time to break down in a small brisket as it does in a large brisket and the only difference in the total cook time is the time it takes the internal temp to get to a predifined temp. The larger one taking longer.

I think this makes sense. What do you think?

Thanks,


frohe 04-16-2012 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michiana mark (Post 908193)
No need to rush a brisket along, let him hang out in the smoke as long as he needs to.

In other words, it's done when it's done. No words are more true when it comes to brisket. Each cut has its own peculiarities which just has to be dealt with. When you can slide a probe into it like a hot knife going into butter, it's done. Check the temp BUT don't rely on it.

VoodoChild 04-16-2012 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frohe (Post 2017903)
In other words, it's done when it's done. No words are more true when it comes to brisket. Each cut has its own peculiarities which just has to be dealt with. When you can slide a probe into it like a hot knife going into butter, it's done. Check the temp BUT don't rely on it.


I Showed this info to my Wife who still Thinks Briskit is done when shes ready to eat !!!!

ThatsWhatSheSaidBBQ 04-16-2012 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElJefe (Post 2017623)
You might consider cooking the smaller briskets at a lower temp (say 200) for a longer period of time.

IMO, this is your ONLY logical option... That or never cut a 6lb flat in half..not the best idea to begin with (IMO)..

les 500k 06-04-2012 07:01 AM

I know this has been up for a while but It's new to me! Makes perfect sense! Good and useful info.

SmokinAussie 06-04-2012 07:21 AM

Yes, I think we've all learned something here.... not quite sure what... but something.

If a Brisket is a she, do you think she prefers her fat cap up, or down?

I'm off to the PB now...

Byeeeee

Bill

Luvbbq 10-27-2014 10:01 AM

Wow!!!! So much info on cooking a brisket i love it.. Thanks guys on the great info!

Sean "Puffy" Coals 10-27-2014 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokinAussie (Post 2079821)
Yes, I think we've all learned something here.... not quite sure what... but something.

If a Brisket is a she, do you think she prefers her fat cap up, or down?

I'm off to the PB now...

Byeeeee

Bill

NO! Never talk about a female brisket having a fat cap! Or being fatty or having to trim any fat! It's a fight you CANNOT WIN! Your female brisket is always perfect just the way she is. Trust me, pick your battles carefully.

Anyway, I subscribe to the "time/temp relationship theory". IMHE, cooking any large piece of meat isn't as black and white as choosing between "hot & fast" or "Low and slow" It's about balancing the cooking temp with you desired finishing time. Yes, cooking "hotter" will make the meat cook faster, but I believe it also increases evaporation and CAN, but will not necessarily result in the outside being more done than the center an/or incomplete fat rendering.

We've all had that experience of eating something that is cooked too fast- like a frozen chicken wing or something where the outside is done, but the middle is still cold/raw. I think there are similar things at play when cooking BBQ.

IMHE, even increased heat will not have the same effect on the breakdown of collagen as longer exposure to lower temps, because the "time" plays a bigger role in the relationship than the "temp" does.

I always plan to cook large pieces or meat for as long as I possibly can, because I like the results better. I have cooked many butts and a couple briskets at what would be considered "hot & fast" but I still prefer the texture and flavor of the ones I cooked longer and lower. IMHE, they have more flavor, less unrendered fat and are more juicy.

Bludawg 10-27-2014 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg60525 (Post 907323)
I cut a 6.7 lb brisket flat in half to do an injection/rub comparison. So, if your going by time per pound I figured about 4 - 5 hours. I foiled the brisket with some of the leftover injection at ~ 170°F and cooked for about another hour ending with the temp at 206°F. The pit temp was 250°F. The main goal was a flavor comparison. When I was done I was able to make my judgement on taste, but the tenderness, although good for sandwiches, was not competition quality tender. I was pressed for time and wasn't overly concerned about it, but I want to check my understanding of what has occurred.

So, here's my understanding.........please correct, comment, etc..

Although a smaller brisket will come up to temperature quicker than a larger one, that is not the whole story. It is a time/temperature relationship because it's the connective tissue that has to break down to make the brisket tender. The internal temp of 206°F is quite a bit higher than I take the 10 pounders, but it reached it so much quicker, which makes sense due to its small size. To me it would seem that it would take the connective tissue the same amount of time to break down in a small brisket as it does in a large brisket and the only difference in the total cook time is the time it takes the internal temp to get to a predifined temp. The larger one taking longer.

I think this makes sense. What do you think?

Thanks,

What you call connective tissue is actually Collagen it is the Glue that holds muscle fibers together to form tissue. Collagen begins to melt at 180 deg once it is fully melted above 190 it has changed into Gelatin. It is the gelatin that gives meat it's moisture this is why and under cooked brisket is Dry and Tough. cooking H&F the meat will push past the 190 point before the collagen has been fully converted this is what a H&F brisket finishes at a much higher IT. This same principle explains why a smaller piece needs to go to a higher IT to reach the same level of tenderness & moisture. You will never achieve a level of consistency cooking to an internal temp. Read the Basic Rules for BBQ Success.

BBQ RULES FOR SUCCESS

"YOU CAN NOT COOK GREAT BBQ ON A CONSISTENT BASIS COOKING TO AN INTERNAL TEMP OR BY TIME(XXX MIN PER LB) YOU MUST COOK BY FEEL!"For a Brisket that is probe tender in the thickest part of the Flat, Pork Butts when the Bone wiggles lose, Ribs pass the Bend Test. These are the only reliable methods to indicate the proper time to declare the cook completed with success.

1buckie 10-27-2014 11:47 AM

Starts a little lower, Blu......

http://www.scienceofcooking.com/meat/slow_cooking1.htm

Otherwise, great description......:wink:

Bludawg 10-27-2014 02:00 PM

I Stand Corrected! Book marked for future ref.

jasonjax 10-27-2014 04:19 PM

I am still a firm believer that somehow there is some magic quality (has to be science behind it ..I just don't know it) about cooking bigger pieces of meat and lots of meat at once that somehow imparts a better tenderness and even flavor.

I have my lay-person non scientific opinions on it. Like maybe the additional thermal mass of the meat regulates the temperature better and maybe the release of so much moisture as the connective tissue adds to the humidity.

I'm still noodling on what makes it taste better. Maybe the meat releases something into the air of the cooker.:idea:

jasonjax 10-27-2014 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bludawg (Post 3083339)
What you call connective tissue is actually Collagen it is the Glue that holds muscle fibers together to form tissue. Collagen begins to melt at 180 deg once it is fully melted above 190 it has changed into Gelatin. It is the gelatin that gives meat it's moisture this is why and under cooked brisket is Dry and Tough. cooking H&F the meat will push past the 190 point before the collagen has been fully converted this is what a H&F brisket finishes at a much higher IT. This same principle explains why a smaller piece needs to go to a higher IT to reach the same level of tenderness & moisture. You will never achieve a level of consistency cooking to an internal temp. Read the Basic Rules for BBQ Success.

BBQ RULES FOR SUCCESS

"YOU CAN NOT COOK GREAT BBQ ON A CONSISTENT BASIS COOKING TO AN INTERNAL TEMP OR BY TIME(XXX MIN PER LB) YOU MUST COOK BY FEEL!"For a Brisket that is probe tender in the thickest part of the Flat, Pork Butts when the Bone wiggles lose, Ribs pass the Bend Test. These are the only reliable methods to indicate the proper time to declare the cook completed with success.

Just when BD annoys me with his sometimes terse responses he posts crap like this that makes me like and respect him again. Hehe.

jim23456789 12-01-2015 07:32 AM

So what did you conclude from your comparison?

what did you use for each?

darkoozy 12-14-2015 09:27 AM

I believe your assesment is correct....

I have been cooking brisket points when I can find them, and they take almost as long as a full packer to reach the proper tenderness.

The first time I did this I was quite surprised when I assumed the smaller cut of meat (approx 4lb) would be done in half the time...I just wrap them earlier in the cook, and let them sail until probe tender.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2003 -2012 © BBQ-Brethren Inc. All rights reserved. All Content and Flaming Pig Logo are registered and protected under U.S and International Copyright and Trademarks. Content Within this Website Is Property of BBQ Brethren Inc. Reproduction or alteration is strictly prohibited.